Simulated malingering in pain patients: A study with the Pain Patient Profile

B. E. McGuire*, A. G. Harvey, E. A. Shores

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    14 Citations (Scopus)


    Objective. To investigate the utility of the Pain Patient Profile (P3) in detecting those who are faking or exaggerating complaints of pain while attempting to avoid detection. Method. A control group of pain patients ('Pain Controls'; PC; N = 62) was compared with a general clinical group who did not report pain but were instructed to simulate malingered pain ('General Rehabilitation Simulators', GR; N = 34); and a group whose primary problem was chronic pain who were instructed to exaggerate the extent of their pain and related problems ('Pain Simulators' PS; N = 26). Results. Both groups of simulating participants reported significantly higher scores on all clinical scales (anxiety, depression, somatization) compared with non-simulating control participants and were more likely to obtain an abnormal T-score on the clinical scales. The validity scale was able to differentiate the PS group from the PC group, but the GR group was not differentiated from the PC group by the validity scale. Conclusions. The results indicate that with further study, the P3 may be a useful adjunct to the clinical assessment of symptom magnification in pain claimants.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)71-79
    Number of pages9
    JournalBritish Journal of Clinical Psychology
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2001


    Dive into the research topics of 'Simulated malingering in pain patients: A study with the Pain Patient Profile'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this