Simulation of driving in low-visibility conditions: Does stereopsis improve speed perception?

Kevin R. Brooks, Mohammed E. Rafat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Laboratory-based studies of perceived speed show that, under most circumstances, perceived speed is reduced as a function of contrast. However, a recent investigation of perceived vehicular speed while driving around a closed road circuit showed no such effect (Owens, Wood, & Carberry, 2010, Perception, 39, 1199-1215). We sought to probe the source of this discrepancy, asking whether the presence or absence of stereoscopic motion information might account for the difference in results. In a two-alternative forced-choice psychophysical speed-discrimination task, observers compared the speed of high-and low-contrast driving clips filmed with a 3‑D camera and presented either stereoscopically (3‑D) or monoscopically (2‑D). Although perceived speed was reduced at low contrast, the size of this misperception was equivalent for 2‑D and 3‑D presentations. However, the inclusion of stereoscopic cues to vehicular speed caused significant improvements in the precision of speed judgments. It is concluded that although stereopsis can provide access to valuable information on perceived speed, contrast-independent speed estimation as demonstrated by Owens et al. (2010) is more likely to reflect the use of the full visual field in a real driving situation (compared with limited field of view simulations), or the additional contributions of nonvisual cues rather than stereopsis.

LanguageEnglish
Pages145-156
Number of pages12
JournalPerception
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Depth Perception
Visibility
Cues
Access to Information
Visual Fields
Surgical Instruments
Wood
Cameras
Discrimination (Psychology)

Cite this

@article{f67fe8f00abb4bc396cc128700e30f39,
title = "Simulation of driving in low-visibility conditions: Does stereopsis improve speed perception?",
abstract = "Laboratory-based studies of perceived speed show that, under most circumstances, perceived speed is reduced as a function of contrast. However, a recent investigation of perceived vehicular speed while driving around a closed road circuit showed no such effect (Owens, Wood, & Carberry, 2010, Perception, 39, 1199-1215). We sought to probe the source of this discrepancy, asking whether the presence or absence of stereoscopic motion information might account for the difference in results. In a two-alternative forced-choice psychophysical speed-discrimination task, observers compared the speed of high-and low-contrast driving clips filmed with a 3‑D camera and presented either stereoscopically (3‑D) or monoscopically (2‑D). Although perceived speed was reduced at low contrast, the size of this misperception was equivalent for 2‑D and 3‑D presentations. However, the inclusion of stereoscopic cues to vehicular speed caused significant improvements in the precision of speed judgments. It is concluded that although stereopsis can provide access to valuable information on perceived speed, contrast-independent speed estimation as demonstrated by Owens et al. (2010) is more likely to reflect the use of the full visual field in a real driving situation (compared with limited field of view simulations), or the additional contributions of nonvisual cues rather than stereopsis.",
author = "Brooks, {Kevin R.} and Rafat, {Mohammed E.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1068/p7779",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "145--156",
journal = "Perception",
issn = "0301-0066",
publisher = "Pion",
number = "2",

}

Simulation of driving in low-visibility conditions : Does stereopsis improve speed perception? / Brooks, Kevin R.; Rafat, Mohammed E.

In: Perception, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2015, p. 145-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simulation of driving in low-visibility conditions

T2 - Perception

AU - Brooks, Kevin R.

AU - Rafat, Mohammed E.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Laboratory-based studies of perceived speed show that, under most circumstances, perceived speed is reduced as a function of contrast. However, a recent investigation of perceived vehicular speed while driving around a closed road circuit showed no such effect (Owens, Wood, & Carberry, 2010, Perception, 39, 1199-1215). We sought to probe the source of this discrepancy, asking whether the presence or absence of stereoscopic motion information might account for the difference in results. In a two-alternative forced-choice psychophysical speed-discrimination task, observers compared the speed of high-and low-contrast driving clips filmed with a 3‑D camera and presented either stereoscopically (3‑D) or monoscopically (2‑D). Although perceived speed was reduced at low contrast, the size of this misperception was equivalent for 2‑D and 3‑D presentations. However, the inclusion of stereoscopic cues to vehicular speed caused significant improvements in the precision of speed judgments. It is concluded that although stereopsis can provide access to valuable information on perceived speed, contrast-independent speed estimation as demonstrated by Owens et al. (2010) is more likely to reflect the use of the full visual field in a real driving situation (compared with limited field of view simulations), or the additional contributions of nonvisual cues rather than stereopsis.

AB - Laboratory-based studies of perceived speed show that, under most circumstances, perceived speed is reduced as a function of contrast. However, a recent investigation of perceived vehicular speed while driving around a closed road circuit showed no such effect (Owens, Wood, & Carberry, 2010, Perception, 39, 1199-1215). We sought to probe the source of this discrepancy, asking whether the presence or absence of stereoscopic motion information might account for the difference in results. In a two-alternative forced-choice psychophysical speed-discrimination task, observers compared the speed of high-and low-contrast driving clips filmed with a 3‑D camera and presented either stereoscopically (3‑D) or monoscopically (2‑D). Although perceived speed was reduced at low contrast, the size of this misperception was equivalent for 2‑D and 3‑D presentations. However, the inclusion of stereoscopic cues to vehicular speed caused significant improvements in the precision of speed judgments. It is concluded that although stereopsis can provide access to valuable information on perceived speed, contrast-independent speed estimation as demonstrated by Owens et al. (2010) is more likely to reflect the use of the full visual field in a real driving situation (compared with limited field of view simulations), or the additional contributions of nonvisual cues rather than stereopsis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924147429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1068/p7779

DO - 10.1068/p7779

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 145

EP - 156

JO - Perception

JF - Perception

SN - 0301-0066

IS - 2

ER -