Skill generalisation in teaching spelling to children with learning difficulties

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

A central focus in remedial teaching is the generalisation of responses to contexts in which a student has never been explicitly instructed. Remarkably little is known about how and when generalisation occurs. In this article we examine generalisation effects in the context of spelling. Three areas are discussed: generalisation between spelling and reading, generalisation to untrained sound-letter-correspondences and generalisation to untrained unpredictable words. The research presented indicates both that reading training often leads to spelling improvements and that spelling training leads to reading improvements. There is a tendency for spelling training to be more likely to induce changes in reading than vice versa. In addition, for unpredictable words, generalisation is more likely to occur for words of high frequency and words that are orthographically similar to many other words. We conclude that a better understanding of how generalisation occurs will enable us to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of remedial spelling programmes.

LanguageEnglish
Pages115-129
Number of pages15
JournalAustralian Journal of Learning Difficulties
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2010

Fingerprint

learning disorder
Teaching
Learning
Reading
Remedial Teaching
Response Generalization
efficiency
Generalization (Psychology)
Students
student
Efficiency
Research

Cite this

@article{f0e73fd2ef104e32afc568316c7c51da,
title = "Skill generalisation in teaching spelling to children with learning difficulties",
abstract = "A central focus in remedial teaching is the generalisation of responses to contexts in which a student has never been explicitly instructed. Remarkably little is known about how and when generalisation occurs. In this article we examine generalisation effects in the context of spelling. Three areas are discussed: generalisation between spelling and reading, generalisation to untrained sound-letter-correspondences and generalisation to untrained unpredictable words. The research presented indicates both that reading training often leads to spelling improvements and that spelling training leads to reading improvements. There is a tendency for spelling training to be more likely to induce changes in reading than vice versa. In addition, for unpredictable words, generalisation is more likely to occur for words of high frequency and words that are orthographically similar to many other words. We conclude that a better understanding of how generalisation occurs will enable us to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of remedial spelling programmes.",
author = "Saskia Kohnen and Lyndsey Nickels and Max Coltheart",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1080/19404158.2010.502588",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "115--129",
journal = "Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties",
issn = "1940-4158",
publisher = "Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group",
number = "2",

}

Skill generalisation in teaching spelling to children with learning difficulties. / Kohnen, Saskia; Nickels, Lyndsey; Coltheart, Max.

In: Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, Vol. 15, No. 2, 11.2010, p. 115-129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Skill generalisation in teaching spelling to children with learning difficulties

AU - Kohnen, Saskia

AU - Nickels, Lyndsey

AU - Coltheart, Max

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - A central focus in remedial teaching is the generalisation of responses to contexts in which a student has never been explicitly instructed. Remarkably little is known about how and when generalisation occurs. In this article we examine generalisation effects in the context of spelling. Three areas are discussed: generalisation between spelling and reading, generalisation to untrained sound-letter-correspondences and generalisation to untrained unpredictable words. The research presented indicates both that reading training often leads to spelling improvements and that spelling training leads to reading improvements. There is a tendency for spelling training to be more likely to induce changes in reading than vice versa. In addition, for unpredictable words, generalisation is more likely to occur for words of high frequency and words that are orthographically similar to many other words. We conclude that a better understanding of how generalisation occurs will enable us to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of remedial spelling programmes.

AB - A central focus in remedial teaching is the generalisation of responses to contexts in which a student has never been explicitly instructed. Remarkably little is known about how and when generalisation occurs. In this article we examine generalisation effects in the context of spelling. Three areas are discussed: generalisation between spelling and reading, generalisation to untrained sound-letter-correspondences and generalisation to untrained unpredictable words. The research presented indicates both that reading training often leads to spelling improvements and that spelling training leads to reading improvements. There is a tendency for spelling training to be more likely to induce changes in reading than vice versa. In addition, for unpredictable words, generalisation is more likely to occur for words of high frequency and words that are orthographically similar to many other words. We conclude that a better understanding of how generalisation occurs will enable us to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of remedial spelling programmes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960882661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19404158.2010.502588

DO - 10.1080/19404158.2010.502588

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 115

EP - 129

JO - Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties

T2 - Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties

JF - Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties

SN - 1940-4158

IS - 2

ER -