Slippery beasts: why academic freedom and media freedom are so difficult to protect

Fred D'Agostino, Peter Greste

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

It is easy to confuse academic freedom with freedom of speech, but it is illuminating to consider the responsibilities that frame academic freedom and thus distinguish it from the less constrained freedoms to speak that characterise our roles as citizens of democratic societies. In particular, scholars and scientists are subject to standards of rigour and integrity. While academics sometimes fail to live up to these standards, we consider a difficulty that arises even when they do. This is a collective action failure that arises because of the incentives that motivate choices of topics and approaches by scholars and scientists and it results in overconcentration of academic effort. Diversity within the academy is a potential antidote to this difficulty. We explore these issues from within our different professional perspectives and note some analogies between the situation of academics on the one hand and journalists on the other.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-52
Number of pages8
JournalAustralian Universities' Review
Volume63
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • negative freedom
  • positive freedom
  • tragedy of the commons
  • groupthink
  • diversity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Slippery beasts: why academic freedom and media freedom are so difficult to protect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this