Smoke and mirrors

Unanswered questions and misleading statements obscure the truth about organ sources in China

Wendy A. Rogers*, Torsten Trey, Maria Fiatarone Singh, Madeleine Bridgett, Katrina A. Bramstedt, Jacob Lavee

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This response refutes the claim made in a recent article that organs for transplantation in China will no longer be sourced from executed prisoners. We identify ongoing ethical problems due to the lack of transparent data on current numbers of transplants in China; implausible and conflicting claims about voluntary donations; and obfuscation about who counts as a voluntary donor. The big unanswered question in Chinese transplant ethics is the source of organs, and until there is an open and independently audited system in China, legitimate concerns remain about organ harvesting from prisoners of conscience.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)552-553
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume42
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2016

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Smoke and mirrors: Unanswered questions and misleading statements obscure the truth about organ sources in China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this