TY - JOUR
T1 - Social Mix Discourse and Local Resistance to Social Housing
T2 - The Case of the Nation Building Economic Stimulus Plan, Australia
AU - Ruming, Kristian
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - In response to the Global Financial Crisis of 2007-2009, the Australian government introduced the Nation Building Economic Stimulus Plan. Central to the plan was the allocation of AU$5 billion to the construction of 19 000 new social housing dwellings. The construction was seen by the Australian government to be a way of stimulating the economy and adding to the social housing sector. While social housing construction was supported by the not-for-profit sector and academics, a number of localised disputes arose. This article traces the ways in which the discourse of social mix was mobilised by residents to resist social housing construction. Simultaneously, the discourse of social mix was used to position residents as supporters of social housing, while actively seeking to resist new construction in their neighbourhood, which was positioned as running counter to the ideals embedded within the discourse. In promoting the perceived benefits embedded within the discourse of social mix, residents mobilised a complex resistance strategy that worked to destabilise claims of self-interest and NIMBYism.
AB - In response to the Global Financial Crisis of 2007-2009, the Australian government introduced the Nation Building Economic Stimulus Plan. Central to the plan was the allocation of AU$5 billion to the construction of 19 000 new social housing dwellings. The construction was seen by the Australian government to be a way of stimulating the economy and adding to the social housing sector. While social housing construction was supported by the not-for-profit sector and academics, a number of localised disputes arose. This article traces the ways in which the discourse of social mix was mobilised by residents to resist social housing construction. Simultaneously, the discourse of social mix was used to position residents as supporters of social housing, while actively seeking to resist new construction in their neighbourhood, which was positioned as running counter to the ideals embedded within the discourse. In promoting the perceived benefits embedded within the discourse of social mix, residents mobilised a complex resistance strategy that worked to destabilise claims of self-interest and NIMBYism.
KW - Social mix
KW - community opposition
KW - discourse
KW - social housing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902888997&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08111146.2013.844121
DO - 10.1080/08111146.2013.844121
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84902888997
VL - 32
SP - 163
EP - 183
JO - Urban Policy and Research
JF - Urban Policy and Research
SN - 0811-1146
IS - 2
ER -