Abstract
Much of the diversity management debate is trapped in a binary opposition between regulation and voluntarism. We argue for an evidence-based approach and illustrate this by offering a context-sensitive overview of workforce diversity debate and practice in three countries: France, Canada and the UK. We use Reynaud's social regulation theory in order to challenge the assumption that there is a clear separation between regulation and voluntarism. The article unpacks the complexities and ambivalences of regulation of workforce diversity, which is generated by multiple influences.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 309-327 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | European Journal of Industrial Relations |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Diversity management
- regulation of workforce diversity
- social regulation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Social regulation and diversity management: A comparative study of France, Canada and the UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver