Abstract
Rawls relies on the version of economic theory represented by Koopmans (1957) when constructing his theory of justice. In this paper it is argued that as economic theory à la Koopmans is representative of that theoretical tradition in which exchange forms the basis of value, it lacks a notion of cooperation that is sufficiently strong to support Rawls’s conception of society as a “cooperative venture for mutual advantage”. The social vision underlying Rawls’s argument is that of a modern economy subject to widespread specialisation and division of labour, yet neoclassical theory with its exchange focus is shown to be incapable of dealing adequately with such a case. The incompatibility of social visions between Rawls’s argument and the economic theory used in part in its construction is a source of structural weakness and illustrates graphically the pitfalls associated with uncritical reliance, in one discipline, on theoretical frameworks imported from another.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Heterodox economic perspectives on contemporary issues |
| Subtitle of host publication | proceedings, refereed papers of the Sixth Australian Society of Heterodox Economists Conference, 10-11 December, 2007, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia |
| Editors | Lynne Chester, Michael Johnson |
| Place of Publication | Sydney |
| Publisher | Society of Heterodox Economists |
| Pages | 8-19 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780733425820 |
| Publication status | Published - 2007 |
| Event | Australian Society of Heterodox Economists Conference (6th : 2007) - Sydney Duration: 10 Dec 2007 → 11 Dec 2007 |
Conference
| Conference | Australian Society of Heterodox Economists Conference (6th : 2007) |
|---|---|
| City | Sydney |
| Period | 10/12/07 → 11/12/07 |
Keywords
- history of economic thought
- economics
- social values
- equity
- justice
- inequality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Social visions and the just society: ss neoclassical theory an adequate basis for Rawlsian justice?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver