Sociocarbon cycles: assembling and governing forest carbon in Indonesia

Andrew McGregor, Edward Challies, Amanda Thomas, Rini Astuti, Peter Howson, Suraya Afiff, Sara Kindon, Sophie Bond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

As Indonesia's REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation) program unfolds, it is transforming people and places in unexpected ways, and reconfiguring human and non-human processes. In this paper we recognize that forest carbon governance is about much more than carbon. Reflecting on observations from research in Indonesia, we develop the concept of sociocarbon cycles in an effort to move beyond the human-nature dualisms that characterize much work on REDD+. We see carbon governance as emergent sets of arrangements that are continually tested and challenged through the agency of diverse human and non-human actors. Drawing on insights from the literature on socionatures, and in particular on work on hydrosocial cycles, we approach carbon as a socionatural achievement, constituted through relations among institutions, carbon technologies, and C atoms. Our approach recasts REDD+ as an inherently political program, rather than a techno-scientific response to climate change. This, we contend, opens up new ways of conceptualizing and approaching carbon. A sociocarbon lens highlights the importance of social research in reconceptualising biophysical carbon cycles; brings questions of justice and power to the fore (who wins and who loses from carbon initiatives); and aids in understanding what carbon is, how it is made known, and how competing carbon claims are sustained. We suggest that a sociocarbon lens provides multiple points of entry to pursue more just geometries of power.

LanguageEnglish
Pages32-41
Number of pages10
JournalGeoforum
Volume99
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Indonesia
governance
political program
social research
climate change
justice
mathematics
literature

Keywords

  • Carbon governance
  • Forest carbon
  • Geometries of power
  • Indonesia
  • REDD+
  • Socionature

Cite this

McGregor, A., Challies, E., Thomas, A., Astuti, R., Howson, P., Afiff, S., ... Bond, S. (2019). Sociocarbon cycles: assembling and governing forest carbon in Indonesia. Geoforum, 99, 32-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.12.003
McGregor, Andrew ; Challies, Edward ; Thomas, Amanda ; Astuti, Rini ; Howson, Peter ; Afiff, Suraya ; Kindon, Sara ; Bond, Sophie. / Sociocarbon cycles : assembling and governing forest carbon in Indonesia. In: Geoforum. 2019 ; Vol. 99. pp. 32-41.
@article{750802ae37084d84a218c68be99a9017,
title = "Sociocarbon cycles: assembling and governing forest carbon in Indonesia",
abstract = "As Indonesia's REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation) program unfolds, it is transforming people and places in unexpected ways, and reconfiguring human and non-human processes. In this paper we recognize that forest carbon governance is about much more than carbon. Reflecting on observations from research in Indonesia, we develop the concept of sociocarbon cycles in an effort to move beyond the human-nature dualisms that characterize much work on REDD+. We see carbon governance as emergent sets of arrangements that are continually tested and challenged through the agency of diverse human and non-human actors. Drawing on insights from the literature on socionatures, and in particular on work on hydrosocial cycles, we approach carbon as a socionatural achievement, constituted through relations among institutions, carbon technologies, and C atoms. Our approach recasts REDD+ as an inherently political program, rather than a techno-scientific response to climate change. This, we contend, opens up new ways of conceptualizing and approaching carbon. A sociocarbon lens highlights the importance of social research in reconceptualising biophysical carbon cycles; brings questions of justice and power to the fore (who wins and who loses from carbon initiatives); and aids in understanding what carbon is, how it is made known, and how competing carbon claims are sustained. We suggest that a sociocarbon lens provides multiple points of entry to pursue more just geometries of power.",
keywords = "Carbon governance, Forest carbon, Geometries of power, Indonesia, REDD+, Socionature",
author = "Andrew McGregor and Edward Challies and Amanda Thomas and Rini Astuti and Peter Howson and Suraya Afiff and Sara Kindon and Sophie Bond",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.12.003",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
pages = "32--41",
journal = "Geoforum",
issn = "0016-7185",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

McGregor, A, Challies, E, Thomas, A, Astuti, R, Howson, P, Afiff, S, Kindon, S & Bond, S 2019, 'Sociocarbon cycles: assembling and governing forest carbon in Indonesia', Geoforum, vol. 99, pp. 32-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.12.003

Sociocarbon cycles : assembling and governing forest carbon in Indonesia. / McGregor, Andrew; Challies, Edward; Thomas, Amanda; Astuti, Rini; Howson, Peter; Afiff, Suraya; Kindon, Sara; Bond, Sophie.

In: Geoforum, Vol. 99, 02.2019, p. 32-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sociocarbon cycles

T2 - Geoforum

AU - McGregor, Andrew

AU - Challies, Edward

AU - Thomas, Amanda

AU - Astuti, Rini

AU - Howson, Peter

AU - Afiff, Suraya

AU - Kindon, Sara

AU - Bond, Sophie

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - As Indonesia's REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation) program unfolds, it is transforming people and places in unexpected ways, and reconfiguring human and non-human processes. In this paper we recognize that forest carbon governance is about much more than carbon. Reflecting on observations from research in Indonesia, we develop the concept of sociocarbon cycles in an effort to move beyond the human-nature dualisms that characterize much work on REDD+. We see carbon governance as emergent sets of arrangements that are continually tested and challenged through the agency of diverse human and non-human actors. Drawing on insights from the literature on socionatures, and in particular on work on hydrosocial cycles, we approach carbon as a socionatural achievement, constituted through relations among institutions, carbon technologies, and C atoms. Our approach recasts REDD+ as an inherently political program, rather than a techno-scientific response to climate change. This, we contend, opens up new ways of conceptualizing and approaching carbon. A sociocarbon lens highlights the importance of social research in reconceptualising biophysical carbon cycles; brings questions of justice and power to the fore (who wins and who loses from carbon initiatives); and aids in understanding what carbon is, how it is made known, and how competing carbon claims are sustained. We suggest that a sociocarbon lens provides multiple points of entry to pursue more just geometries of power.

AB - As Indonesia's REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation) program unfolds, it is transforming people and places in unexpected ways, and reconfiguring human and non-human processes. In this paper we recognize that forest carbon governance is about much more than carbon. Reflecting on observations from research in Indonesia, we develop the concept of sociocarbon cycles in an effort to move beyond the human-nature dualisms that characterize much work on REDD+. We see carbon governance as emergent sets of arrangements that are continually tested and challenged through the agency of diverse human and non-human actors. Drawing on insights from the literature on socionatures, and in particular on work on hydrosocial cycles, we approach carbon as a socionatural achievement, constituted through relations among institutions, carbon technologies, and C atoms. Our approach recasts REDD+ as an inherently political program, rather than a techno-scientific response to climate change. This, we contend, opens up new ways of conceptualizing and approaching carbon. A sociocarbon lens highlights the importance of social research in reconceptualising biophysical carbon cycles; brings questions of justice and power to the fore (who wins and who loses from carbon initiatives); and aids in understanding what carbon is, how it is made known, and how competing carbon claims are sustained. We suggest that a sociocarbon lens provides multiple points of entry to pursue more just geometries of power.

KW - Carbon governance

KW - Forest carbon

KW - Geometries of power

KW - Indonesia

KW - REDD+

KW - Socionature

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059456234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.12.003

M3 - Article

VL - 99

SP - 32

EP - 41

JO - Geoforum

JF - Geoforum

SN - 0016-7185

ER -