Sociology and the critique of neoliberalism: reflections on Peter Wagner and Axel Honneth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Neoliberalism's project of making the market the model for all modern freedoms means that critique needs to be able to unmask the distortions and to weigh the costs of its cultural appropriations and resignifications. This diagnostic/evaluative task presents a seeming challenge to the sociologist who is also answerable to scientific purposes that demand objectivity and impartiality. This article investigates two very different attempts to grasp this nettle. It contrasts Peter Wagner's proposal to reclaim critique as 'an essential feature of the social sciences' with Axel Honneth's call for a reinvigoration of the 'sociologizing dimension' of a critical theory tradition. It is argued that neither approach is fully adequate to the challenges set by neoliberalism. The final section of the article suggests that to demonstrate the efficacy of sociology's contribution to a critique of neoliberalism we need to review the relationship between theoretical reflection and everyday thinking and permit the former to do more analytic/evaluative work.

LanguageEnglish
Pages516-533
Number of pages18
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Theory
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

neoliberalism
sociology
critical theory
objectivity
sociologist
diagnostic
social science
demand
market
costs

Keywords

  • critique
  • Honneth
  • neoliberalism
  • sociology
  • Wagner

Cite this

@article{291d4d9e52b64ce79dbd26e9019285fe,
title = "Sociology and the critique of neoliberalism: reflections on Peter Wagner and Axel Honneth",
abstract = "Neoliberalism's project of making the market the model for all modern freedoms means that critique needs to be able to unmask the distortions and to weigh the costs of its cultural appropriations and resignifications. This diagnostic/evaluative task presents a seeming challenge to the sociologist who is also answerable to scientific purposes that demand objectivity and impartiality. This article investigates two very different attempts to grasp this nettle. It contrasts Peter Wagner's proposal to reclaim critique as 'an essential feature of the social sciences' with Axel Honneth's call for a reinvigoration of the 'sociologizing dimension' of a critical theory tradition. It is argued that neither approach is fully adequate to the challenges set by neoliberalism. The final section of the article suggests that to demonstrate the efficacy of sociology's contribution to a critique of neoliberalism we need to review the relationship between theoretical reflection and everyday thinking and permit the former to do more analytic/evaluative work.",
keywords = "critique, Honneth, neoliberalism, sociology, Wagner",
author = "Pauline Johnson",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/1368431014534354",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "516--533",
journal = "European Journal of Social Theory",
issn = "1368-4310",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "4",

}

Sociology and the critique of neoliberalism : reflections on Peter Wagner and Axel Honneth. / Johnson, Pauline.

In: European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2014, p. 516-533.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sociology and the critique of neoliberalism

T2 - European Journal of Social Theory

AU - Johnson, Pauline

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Neoliberalism's project of making the market the model for all modern freedoms means that critique needs to be able to unmask the distortions and to weigh the costs of its cultural appropriations and resignifications. This diagnostic/evaluative task presents a seeming challenge to the sociologist who is also answerable to scientific purposes that demand objectivity and impartiality. This article investigates two very different attempts to grasp this nettle. It contrasts Peter Wagner's proposal to reclaim critique as 'an essential feature of the social sciences' with Axel Honneth's call for a reinvigoration of the 'sociologizing dimension' of a critical theory tradition. It is argued that neither approach is fully adequate to the challenges set by neoliberalism. The final section of the article suggests that to demonstrate the efficacy of sociology's contribution to a critique of neoliberalism we need to review the relationship between theoretical reflection and everyday thinking and permit the former to do more analytic/evaluative work.

AB - Neoliberalism's project of making the market the model for all modern freedoms means that critique needs to be able to unmask the distortions and to weigh the costs of its cultural appropriations and resignifications. This diagnostic/evaluative task presents a seeming challenge to the sociologist who is also answerable to scientific purposes that demand objectivity and impartiality. This article investigates two very different attempts to grasp this nettle. It contrasts Peter Wagner's proposal to reclaim critique as 'an essential feature of the social sciences' with Axel Honneth's call for a reinvigoration of the 'sociologizing dimension' of a critical theory tradition. It is argued that neither approach is fully adequate to the challenges set by neoliberalism. The final section of the article suggests that to demonstrate the efficacy of sociology's contribution to a critique of neoliberalism we need to review the relationship between theoretical reflection and everyday thinking and permit the former to do more analytic/evaluative work.

KW - critique

KW - Honneth

KW - neoliberalism

KW - sociology

KW - Wagner

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908097776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1368431014534354

DO - 10.1177/1368431014534354

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 516

EP - 533

JO - European Journal of Social Theory

JF - European Journal of Social Theory

SN - 1368-4310

IS - 4

ER -