Special access programs warrant further critical attention: authors’ response to open peer commentaries on “ethical justifications for access to unapproved medical interventions: an argument for (limited) patient obligations”

Mary Jean Walker; Wendy A. Rogers; Vikki Entwistle

doi:10.1080/15265161.2014.964558

Special access programs warrant further critical attention: authors’ response to open peer commentaries on “ethical justifications for access to unapproved medical interventions: an argument for (limited) patient obligations”

Mary Jean Walker^*, Wendy A. Rogers, Vikki Entwistle

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/opinion › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	W1-W2
Number of pages	2
Journal	American Journal of Bioethics
Volume	14
Issue number	11
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2014.964558
Publication status	Published - 25 Nov 2014

Access to Document

10.1080/15265161.2014.964558

Cite this

Walker, M. J., Rogers, W. A., & Entwistle, V. (2014). Special access programs warrant further critical attention: authors’ response to open peer commentaries on “ethical justifications for access to unapproved medical interventions: an argument for (limited) patient obligations”. American Journal of Bioethics, 14(11), W1-W2. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2014.964558

@article{0cee6ee4bfce4d2d98c4e63a65953607,

title = "Special access programs warrant further critical attention: authors{\textquoteright} response to open peer commentaries on “ethical justifications for access to unapproved medical interventions: an argument for (limited) patient obligations”",

author = "Walker, {Mary Jean} and Rogers, {Wendy A.} and Vikki Entwistle",

year = "2014",

month = nov,

day = "25",

doi = "10.1080/15265161.2014.964558",

language = "English",

volume = "14",

pages = "W1--W2",

journal = "American Journal of Bioethics",

issn = "1526-5161",

publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

number = "11",

}

Walker, MJ, Rogers, WA & Entwistle, V 2014, 'Special access programs warrant further critical attention: authors’ response to open peer commentaries on “ethical justifications for access to unapproved medical interventions: an argument for (limited) patient obligations”', American Journal of Bioethics, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. W1-W2. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2014.964558

Special access programs warrant further critical attention : authors’ response to open peer commentaries on “ethical justifications for access to unapproved medical interventions: an argument for (limited) patient obligations”. / Walker, Mary Jean; Rogers, Wendy A.; Entwistle, Vikki.

In: American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 14, No. 11, 25.11.2014, p. W1-W2.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/opinion › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Special access programs warrant further critical attention

T2 - authors’ response to open peer commentaries on “ethical justifications for access to unapproved medical interventions: an argument for (limited) patient obligations”

AU - Walker, Mary Jean

AU - Rogers, Wendy A.

AU - Entwistle, Vikki

PY - 2014/11/25

Y1 - 2014/11/25

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908024981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15265161.2014.964558

DO - 10.1080/15265161.2014.964558

M3 - Comment/opinion

C2 - 25325817

AN - SCOPUS:84908024981

VL - 14

SP - W1-W2

JO - American Journal of Bioethics

JF - American Journal of Bioethics

SN - 1526-5161

IS - 11

ER -

Special access programs warrant further critical attention: authors’ response to open peer commentaries on “ethical justifications for access to unapproved medical interventions: an argument for (limited) patient obligations”

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this