Stable isotopic evidence for methane seeps in Neoproterozoic postglacial cap carbonates

Ganqing Jiang*, Martin J. Kennedy, Nicholas Christie-Blick

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

367 Citations (Scopus)


The Earth's most severe glaciations are thought to have occurred about 600 million years ago, in the late Neoproterozoic era. A puzzling feature of glacial deposits from this interval is that they are overlain by 1-5-m-thick 'cap carbonates' (particulate deep-water marine carbonate rocks) associated with a prominent negative carbon isotope excursion. Cap carbonates have been controversially ascribed to the aftermath of almost complete shutdown of the ocean ecosystems for millions of years during such ice ages-the 'snowball Earth' hypothesis. Conversely, it has also been suggested that these carbonate rocks were the result of destabilization of methane hydrates during deglaciation and concomitant flooding of continental shelves and interior basins. The most compelling criticism of the latter 'methane hydrate' hypothesis has been the apparent lack of extreme isotopic variation in cap carbonates inferred locally to be associated with methane seeps. Here we report carbon isotopic and petrographic data from a Neoproterozoic postglacial cap carbonate in south China that provide direct evidence for methane-influenced processes during deglaciation. This evidence lends strong support to the hypothesis that methane hydrate destabilization contributed to the enigmatic cap carbonate deposition and strongly negative carbon isotopic anomalies following Neoproterozoic ice ages. This explanation requires less extreme environmental disturbance than that implied by the snowball Earth hypothesis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)822-826
Number of pages5
Issue number6968
Publication statusPublished - 18 Dec 2003
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Stable isotopic evidence for methane seeps in Neoproterozoic postglacial cap carbonates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this