Staphylococcus aureus dry-surface biofilms are more resistant to heat treatment than traditional hydrated biofilms

A. Almatroudi, S. Tahir, H. Hu, D. Chowdhury, I. B. Gosbell, S. O. Jensen, G. S. Whiteley, A. K. Deva, T. Glasbey, K. Vickery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: The importance of biofilms to clinical practice is being increasingly realized. Biofilm tolerance to antibiotics is well described but limited work has been conducted on the efficacy of heat disinfection and sterilization against biofilms. Aim: To test the susceptibility of planktonic, hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm forms of Staphylococcus aureus, to dry-heat and wet-heat treatments. Methods: S. aureus was grown as both hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm in the CDC biofilm generator. Biofilm was subjected to a range of temperatures in a hot-air oven (dry heat), water bath or autoclave (wet heat). Findings: Dry-surface biofilms remained culture positive even when treated with the harshest dry-heat condition of 100°C for 60. min. Following autoclaving samples were culture negative but 62-74% of bacteria in dry-surface biofilms remained alive as demonstrated by live/dead staining and confocal microscopy. Dry-surface biofilms subjected to autoclaving at 121°C for up to 30. min recovered and released planktonic cells. Recovery did not occur following autoclaving for longer or at 134°C, at least during the time-period tested. Hydrated biofilm recovered following dry-heat treatment up to 100°C for 10. min but failed to recover following autoclaving despite the presence of 43-60% live cells as demonstrated by live/dead staining. Conclusion: S. aureus dry-surface biofilms are less susceptible to killing by dry heat and steam autoclaving than hydrated biofilms, which are less susceptible to heat treatment than planktonic suspensions.

LanguageEnglish
Pages161-167
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Hospital Infection
Volume98
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Biofilms
Staphylococcus aureus
Hot Temperature
Therapeutics
Staining and Labeling
Disinfection
Steam
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Baths
Confocal Microscopy
Suspensions

Keywords

  • Biofilms
  • Dry-surface biofilms
  • Heat disinfection
  • Heat sterilization
  • Infection control
  • Staphylococcus aureus

Cite this

Almatroudi, A. ; Tahir, S. ; Hu, H. ; Chowdhury, D. ; Gosbell, I. B. ; Jensen, S. O. ; Whiteley, G. S. ; Deva, A. K. ; Glasbey, T. ; Vickery, K. / Staphylococcus aureus dry-surface biofilms are more resistant to heat treatment than traditional hydrated biofilms. In: Journal of Hospital Infection. 2018 ; Vol. 98, No. 2. pp. 161-167.
@article{24c8a5b015aa4fe7b4fbdbde662f7f0f,
title = "Staphylococcus aureus dry-surface biofilms are more resistant to heat treatment than traditional hydrated biofilms",
abstract = "Background: The importance of biofilms to clinical practice is being increasingly realized. Biofilm tolerance to antibiotics is well described but limited work has been conducted on the efficacy of heat disinfection and sterilization against biofilms. Aim: To test the susceptibility of planktonic, hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm forms of Staphylococcus aureus, to dry-heat and wet-heat treatments. Methods: S. aureus was grown as both hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm in the CDC biofilm generator. Biofilm was subjected to a range of temperatures in a hot-air oven (dry heat), water bath or autoclave (wet heat). Findings: Dry-surface biofilms remained culture positive even when treated with the harshest dry-heat condition of 100°C for 60. min. Following autoclaving samples were culture negative but 62-74{\%} of bacteria in dry-surface biofilms remained alive as demonstrated by live/dead staining and confocal microscopy. Dry-surface biofilms subjected to autoclaving at 121°C for up to 30. min recovered and released planktonic cells. Recovery did not occur following autoclaving for longer or at 134°C, at least during the time-period tested. Hydrated biofilm recovered following dry-heat treatment up to 100°C for 10. min but failed to recover following autoclaving despite the presence of 43-60{\%} live cells as demonstrated by live/dead staining. Conclusion: S. aureus dry-surface biofilms are less susceptible to killing by dry heat and steam autoclaving than hydrated biofilms, which are less susceptible to heat treatment than planktonic suspensions.",
keywords = "Biofilms, Dry-surface biofilms, Heat disinfection, Heat sterilization, Infection control, Staphylococcus aureus",
author = "A. Almatroudi and S. Tahir and H. Hu and D. Chowdhury and Gosbell, {I. B.} and Jensen, {S. O.} and Whiteley, {G. S.} and Deva, {A. K.} and T. Glasbey and K. Vickery",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhin.2017.09.007",
language = "English",
volume = "98",
pages = "161--167",
journal = "Journal of Hospital Infection",
issn = "0195-6701",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Staphylococcus aureus dry-surface biofilms are more resistant to heat treatment than traditional hydrated biofilms. / Almatroudi, A.; Tahir, S.; Hu, H.; Chowdhury, D.; Gosbell, I. B.; Jensen, S. O.; Whiteley, G. S.; Deva, A. K.; Glasbey, T.; Vickery, K.

In: Journal of Hospital Infection, Vol. 98, No. 2, 02.2018, p. 161-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Staphylococcus aureus dry-surface biofilms are more resistant to heat treatment than traditional hydrated biofilms

AU - Almatroudi,A.

AU - Tahir,S.

AU - Hu,H.

AU - Chowdhury,D.

AU - Gosbell,I. B.

AU - Jensen,S. O.

AU - Whiteley,G. S.

AU - Deva,A. K.

AU - Glasbey,T.

AU - Vickery,K.

PY - 2018/2

Y1 - 2018/2

N2 - Background: The importance of biofilms to clinical practice is being increasingly realized. Biofilm tolerance to antibiotics is well described but limited work has been conducted on the efficacy of heat disinfection and sterilization against biofilms. Aim: To test the susceptibility of planktonic, hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm forms of Staphylococcus aureus, to dry-heat and wet-heat treatments. Methods: S. aureus was grown as both hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm in the CDC biofilm generator. Biofilm was subjected to a range of temperatures in a hot-air oven (dry heat), water bath or autoclave (wet heat). Findings: Dry-surface biofilms remained culture positive even when treated with the harshest dry-heat condition of 100°C for 60. min. Following autoclaving samples were culture negative but 62-74% of bacteria in dry-surface biofilms remained alive as demonstrated by live/dead staining and confocal microscopy. Dry-surface biofilms subjected to autoclaving at 121°C for up to 30. min recovered and released planktonic cells. Recovery did not occur following autoclaving for longer or at 134°C, at least during the time-period tested. Hydrated biofilm recovered following dry-heat treatment up to 100°C for 10. min but failed to recover following autoclaving despite the presence of 43-60% live cells as demonstrated by live/dead staining. Conclusion: S. aureus dry-surface biofilms are less susceptible to killing by dry heat and steam autoclaving than hydrated biofilms, which are less susceptible to heat treatment than planktonic suspensions.

AB - Background: The importance of biofilms to clinical practice is being increasingly realized. Biofilm tolerance to antibiotics is well described but limited work has been conducted on the efficacy of heat disinfection and sterilization against biofilms. Aim: To test the susceptibility of planktonic, hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm forms of Staphylococcus aureus, to dry-heat and wet-heat treatments. Methods: S. aureus was grown as both hydrated biofilm and dry-surface biofilm in the CDC biofilm generator. Biofilm was subjected to a range of temperatures in a hot-air oven (dry heat), water bath or autoclave (wet heat). Findings: Dry-surface biofilms remained culture positive even when treated with the harshest dry-heat condition of 100°C for 60. min. Following autoclaving samples were culture negative but 62-74% of bacteria in dry-surface biofilms remained alive as demonstrated by live/dead staining and confocal microscopy. Dry-surface biofilms subjected to autoclaving at 121°C for up to 30. min recovered and released planktonic cells. Recovery did not occur following autoclaving for longer or at 134°C, at least during the time-period tested. Hydrated biofilm recovered following dry-heat treatment up to 100°C for 10. min but failed to recover following autoclaving despite the presence of 43-60% live cells as demonstrated by live/dead staining. Conclusion: S. aureus dry-surface biofilms are less susceptible to killing by dry heat and steam autoclaving than hydrated biofilms, which are less susceptible to heat treatment than planktonic suspensions.

KW - Biofilms

KW - Dry-surface biofilms

KW - Heat disinfection

KW - Heat sterilization

KW - Infection control

KW - Staphylococcus aureus

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032977704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.09.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.09.007

M3 - Article

VL - 98

SP - 161

EP - 167

JO - Journal of Hospital Infection

T2 - Journal of Hospital Infection

JF - Journal of Hospital Infection

SN - 0195-6701

IS - 2

ER -