Abstract
In this paper we provide an overview of the issues involved in using statistical analysis to support the process of international negotiation. We will illustrate how the approach can contribute to a negotiator's understanding and control of the interactions that occur during the course of a negotiation. The techniques are suited to the analysis of data collected from ongoing discussions and moves made by the parties. The analyses are used to illuminate influences and processes as they operate in particular cases or in negotiations in general. They do not identify a 'best' strategy or outcome from among alternatives suggested either from theoretical assumptions about rationality and information-processing (see Munier and Rullière's paper in this issue), from personal preference structures (see Spector's paper in this issue), or from a rule-based modeling system (see Kersten's paper in this issue). This distinction should be evident in the discussion to follow, organized into several sections: From Empirical to Normative Analysis; Statistical Analysis for Situational Diagnosis; Time-Series Analysis of Cases, and Knowledge as 'Leverage' Over the Negotiation Process. In a final section, we consider the challenge posed by attempts to implement these techniques with practitioners.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 215-233 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Theory and Decision |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 1993 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- situational diagnosis
- Statistical analysis
- time-series analysis