Abstract
Statistical significance, by itself, is not a sufficient condition for claiming that a hypothesis has been supported. Constructive replications are considerably more important. Unfortunately, classical (Fisherian) statistics are not easily adapted to sequential research strategies; their focus is the single experiment. For this reason, statistically significant results may be meaningless while a particular sequence of nonsignificant results may be quite important. Advice on how to overcome some limitations of classical statistical procedures is given, along with a compendium of "do's and don't's.".
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 290-302 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Journal of Research in Personality |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1982 |
| Externally published | Yes |