Strategic Effects in Word Naming: Examining the Route-Emphasis Versus Time-Criterion Accounts

Dan Chateau, Stephen J. Lupker*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    32 Citations (Scopus)


    K. Rastle and M. Coltheart (1999) demonstrated that both nonwords and low-frequency regular words are named more slowly when mixed with first-phoneme irregular word fillers (e.g., CHEF) than when mixed with third-phoneme irregular word fillers (e.g., GLOW). Those authors suggested that their effects were due to a strategic de-emphasis of the nonlexical route when first-phoneme irregular fillers were used. An alternative explanation is that these results simply reflect a more lax position of a time criterion (S. J. Lupker, P. Brown, & L. Colombo, 1997) in the first-phoneme irregular filler condition. We contrasted these 2 accounts in 4 experiments. In all experiments, target naming latencies were longer when the fillers were harder to name, regardless of whether the fillers were nonwords or exception words, These results strongly favor a time-criterion account of K. Rastle and M. Coltheart's effects.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)139-151
    Number of pages13
    JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2003


    Dive into the research topics of 'Strategic Effects in Word Naming: Examining the Route-Emphasis Versus Time-Criterion Accounts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this