Subject–aux inversion in children with SLI

Kelly Rombough, Rosalind Thornton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

An elicited production study investigated subject–aux inversion in 5-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI) and 2 control groups, typically-developing 5-year-old children and 3-year-old children matched by mean length of utterance. The experimental findings showed that children with specific language impairment produced subject–aux inversion in yes/no questions significantly less often than either of the control groups. However, the fact that lack of inversion is reflected in the input led to the proposal that children with specific language impairment choose the most economical grammatical option. For main clause wh-questions, children with SLI carried out subject–aux inversion at a rate that was not significantly different from the control groups. This finding suggests that these children have access to hierarchical phrase structure representations for questions and the relevant movement operations. In embedded wh-questions, where subject–aux inversion is not permitted, children with SLI implemented SAI more frequently than the control groups. Our interpretation of this finding is that once children with SLI acquire the subject–aux inversion rule, that they are slower to learn that embedded clauses present an exception to the rule.

LanguageEnglish
Pages921-946
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Psycholinguistic Research
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2019

Fingerprint

Language
language
Control Groups
Group
Inversion
Specific Language Impairment
interpretation
Control Group
lack

Keywords

  • specific language impairment
  • subject–aux inversion
  • questions

Cite this

@article{450b60b0cb784983ba7471a6cd396e04,
title = "Subject–aux inversion in children with SLI",
abstract = "An elicited production study investigated subject–aux inversion in 5-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI) and 2 control groups, typically-developing 5-year-old children and 3-year-old children matched by mean length of utterance. The experimental findings showed that children with specific language impairment produced subject–aux inversion in yes/no questions significantly less often than either of the control groups. However, the fact that lack of inversion is reflected in the input led to the proposal that children with specific language impairment choose the most economical grammatical option. For main clause wh-questions, children with SLI carried out subject–aux inversion at a rate that was not significantly different from the control groups. This finding suggests that these children have access to hierarchical phrase structure representations for questions and the relevant movement operations. In embedded wh-questions, where subject–aux inversion is not permitted, children with SLI implemented SAI more frequently than the control groups. Our interpretation of this finding is that once children with SLI acquire the subject–aux inversion rule, that they are slower to learn that embedded clauses present an exception to the rule.",
keywords = "specific language impairment, subject–aux inversion, questions",
author = "Kelly Rombough and Rosalind Thornton",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s10936-019-09640-3",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "921--946",
journal = "Journal of Psycholinguistic Research",
issn = "0090-6905",
publisher = "Springer, Springer Nature",
number = "4",

}

Subject–aux inversion in children with SLI. / Rombough, Kelly; Thornton, Rosalind.

In: Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Vol. 48, No. 4, 08.2019, p. 921-946.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subject–aux inversion in children with SLI

AU - Rombough, Kelly

AU - Thornton, Rosalind

PY - 2019/8

Y1 - 2019/8

N2 - An elicited production study investigated subject–aux inversion in 5-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI) and 2 control groups, typically-developing 5-year-old children and 3-year-old children matched by mean length of utterance. The experimental findings showed that children with specific language impairment produced subject–aux inversion in yes/no questions significantly less often than either of the control groups. However, the fact that lack of inversion is reflected in the input led to the proposal that children with specific language impairment choose the most economical grammatical option. For main clause wh-questions, children with SLI carried out subject–aux inversion at a rate that was not significantly different from the control groups. This finding suggests that these children have access to hierarchical phrase structure representations for questions and the relevant movement operations. In embedded wh-questions, where subject–aux inversion is not permitted, children with SLI implemented SAI more frequently than the control groups. Our interpretation of this finding is that once children with SLI acquire the subject–aux inversion rule, that they are slower to learn that embedded clauses present an exception to the rule.

AB - An elicited production study investigated subject–aux inversion in 5-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI) and 2 control groups, typically-developing 5-year-old children and 3-year-old children matched by mean length of utterance. The experimental findings showed that children with specific language impairment produced subject–aux inversion in yes/no questions significantly less often than either of the control groups. However, the fact that lack of inversion is reflected in the input led to the proposal that children with specific language impairment choose the most economical grammatical option. For main clause wh-questions, children with SLI carried out subject–aux inversion at a rate that was not significantly different from the control groups. This finding suggests that these children have access to hierarchical phrase structure representations for questions and the relevant movement operations. In embedded wh-questions, where subject–aux inversion is not permitted, children with SLI implemented SAI more frequently than the control groups. Our interpretation of this finding is that once children with SLI acquire the subject–aux inversion rule, that they are slower to learn that embedded clauses present an exception to the rule.

KW - specific language impairment

KW - subject–aux inversion

KW - questions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064502555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/CE1101021

U2 - 10.1007/s10936-019-09640-3

DO - 10.1007/s10936-019-09640-3

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 921

EP - 946

JO - Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

T2 - Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

JF - Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

SN - 0090-6905

IS - 4

ER -