Successive approximations of diversity curves

Ten more years in the library

J. Alroy*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Traditional paleontological diversity curves are based on tallies of all taxa appearing in formally defined time units. These tallies are thought to be robust to further data collection. Thus, they supposedly do not reflect nuisance factors like variable time unit lengths and sampling intensity biases. A comparison of a decade-old North American Cenozoic mammal diversity curve and a newer database shows major differences. At least three major factors differentiate the two: use of shorter, fixed-length time intervals; restriction of counts to taxa that cross boundaries between intervals; and correction for variation in sampling intensity. The difference between genus-and species-level data also was examined, but appears to be minor by comparison. Because at best only one pattern can be close to the true historical trajectory, the analyses suggest that the new data and protocols together have yielded a curve that is converging on an accurate signal.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1023-1026
Number of pages4
JournalGeology
Volume28
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cenozoic
  • Diversity curves
  • Macroevolution
  • Mammals
  • Sampling

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Successive approximations of diversity curves: Ten more years in the library'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this