Support from the morphological family when unembedding the stem

Anna Elisabeth Beyersmann, Jonathan Grainger

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    16 Citations (Scopus)


    Recent research investigating embedded stem priming effects with the masked priming paradigm and pseudoword primes (e.g., quickify–quick) has shown that priming effects can be obtained even when the embedded target word is followed by a non-morphological ending (e.g., quickald–quick). Here we examine the specific nature of such priming effects by testing whether they are modulated by morphological family size. We reasoned that if the effects are driven by pre-lexical orthographic processing then they should not be influenced by the family size of the embedded target word. On the contrary, we found that embedded words having several morphologically related family members (e.g., serpentoche–SERPENT [English: snakerel–SNAKE]—serpents, serpentin, serpentine, serpenter, serpentant) generated greater priming than embedded words having only the plural form in the morphological family (e.g., dauphingri–DAUPHIN [English: dolphinald–DOLPHIN]). We therefore conclude that embedded stem priming is at least partly driven by processing at the level of lexical and morpho-semantic representations.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)135-142
    Number of pages8
    JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
    Issue number1
    Early online date2017
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2018


    • morphological processing
    • morphological family
    • embedded stem priming
    • masked priming


    Dive into the research topics of 'Support from the morphological family when unembedding the stem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this