Supporting the Rich

Craig Freedman; David Makofsky

doi:10.2307/41164930

Supporting the Rich

Craig Freedman^*, David Makofsky

^*Corresponding author for this work

Department of Economics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The current political controversy over the role of government in economic affairs has missed one very important issue. At the root of much of the furor is a marked inability or unwillingness to define exactly what government's role has been. Taking an historical perspective, the authors evaluate and establish criteria for government bailouts of private industry, a policy that is consistent with the relationship that has been developing between the two sectors since the Industrial Revolution.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	49-54
Number of pages	6
Journal	California Management Review
Volume	23
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2307/41164930
Publication status	Published - 1981

Access to Document

10.2307/41164930

Cite this

@article{9015699901e443bba26a08bdb41fc66e,

title = "Supporting the Rich",

abstract = "The current political controversy over the role of government in economic affairs has missed one very important issue. At the root of much of the furor is a marked inability or unwillingness to define exactly what government's role has been. Taking an historical perspective, the authors evaluate and establish criteria for government bailouts of private industry, a policy that is consistent with the relationship that has been developing between the two sectors since the Industrial Revolution.",

author = "Craig Freedman and David Makofsky",

year = "1981",

doi = "10.2307/41164930",

language = "English",

volume = "23",

pages = "49--54",

journal = "California Management Review",

issn = "0008-1256",

publisher = "SAGE Publications",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supporting the Rich

AU - Freedman, Craig

AU - Makofsky, David

PY - 1981

Y1 - 1981

N2 - The current political controversy over the role of government in economic affairs has missed one very important issue. At the root of much of the furor is a marked inability or unwillingness to define exactly what government's role has been. Taking an historical perspective, the authors evaluate and establish criteria for government bailouts of private industry, a policy that is consistent with the relationship that has been developing between the two sectors since the Industrial Revolution.

AB - The current political controversy over the role of government in economic affairs has missed one very important issue. At the root of much of the furor is a marked inability or unwillingness to define exactly what government's role has been. Taking an historical perspective, the authors evaluate and establish criteria for government bailouts of private industry, a policy that is consistent with the relationship that has been developing between the two sectors since the Industrial Revolution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84968236287&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/41164930

DO - 10.2307/41164930

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84968236287

SN - 0008-1256

VL - 23

SP - 49

EP - 54

JO - California Management Review

JF - California Management Review

IS - 4

ER -

Supporting the Rich

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this