Surgery and palliative care: Is there common ground or simply a clash of cultures?

David C. Currow, John Cartmill

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearch

    Abstract

    The goal of clinical medicine is to improve or maintain the best possible health and well-being. An intervention is palliative when the primary aim is to optimise function or comfort without an expectation that the course of the illness will be changed. The philosophy of surgery is predicated on a localised, biomechanical intervention at a single point in time, often with an optimism focusing on what could be achieved. Conditions with potential surgical interventions that develop in advanced disease have widely varying manifestations and progression, making studies difficult, leading to greater reliance on clinical intuition for decision-making. The person's premorbid level of function, and the likelihood that any intervention will help them to return to, or maintain, better function, becomes the measures for decisions when considering palliative interventions. Principles include: Do no harm as surgery is trauma and, in someone with progressive, irreversible cachexia, anything that accelerates his/her deterioration is likely to compound disease progression even when minimally invasive. Just because something could be done does not mean that it should be done.

    LanguageEnglish
    Title of host publicationPalliative Surgery
    EditorsMatthias W. Wichmann, Guy Maddern
    Place of PublicationHeidelberg
    PublisherSpringer, Springer Nature
    Pages3-7
    Number of pages5
    ISBN (Electronic)9783642537097
    ISBN (Print)3642537081, 9783642537080
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Palliative Care
    Likelihood Functions
    Intuition
    Cachexia
    Clinical Medicine
    Disease Progression
    Health
    Wounds and Injuries
    Optimism
    Clinical Decision-Making

    Cite this

    Currow, D. C., & Cartmill, J. (2014). Surgery and palliative care: Is there common ground or simply a clash of cultures? In M. W. Wichmann, & G. Maddern (Eds.), Palliative Surgery (pp. 3-7). Heidelberg: Springer, Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53709-7_1
    Currow, David C. ; Cartmill, John. / Surgery and palliative care : Is there common ground or simply a clash of cultures?. Palliative Surgery. editor / Matthias W. Wichmann ; Guy Maddern. Heidelberg : Springer, Springer Nature, 2014. pp. 3-7
    @inbook{a09405d506a94ee7adccf5381f1bd521,
    title = "Surgery and palliative care: Is there common ground or simply a clash of cultures?",
    abstract = "The goal of clinical medicine is to improve or maintain the best possible health and well-being. An intervention is palliative when the primary aim is to optimise function or comfort without an expectation that the course of the illness will be changed. The philosophy of surgery is predicated on a localised, biomechanical intervention at a single point in time, often with an optimism focusing on what could be achieved. Conditions with potential surgical interventions that develop in advanced disease have widely varying manifestations and progression, making studies difficult, leading to greater reliance on clinical intuition for decision-making. The person's premorbid level of function, and the likelihood that any intervention will help them to return to, or maintain, better function, becomes the measures for decisions when considering palliative interventions. Principles include: Do no harm as surgery is trauma and, in someone with progressive, irreversible cachexia, anything that accelerates his/her deterioration is likely to compound disease progression even when minimally invasive. Just because something could be done does not mean that it should be done.",
    author = "Currow, {David C.} and John Cartmill",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1007/978-3-642-53709-7_1",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "3642537081",
    pages = "3--7",
    editor = "Wichmann, {Matthias W.} and Guy Maddern",
    booktitle = "Palliative Surgery",
    publisher = "Springer, Springer Nature",
    address = "United States",

    }

    Currow, DC & Cartmill, J 2014, Surgery and palliative care: Is there common ground or simply a clash of cultures? in MW Wichmann & G Maddern (eds), Palliative Surgery. Springer, Springer Nature, Heidelberg, pp. 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53709-7_1

    Surgery and palliative care : Is there common ground or simply a clash of cultures? / Currow, David C.; Cartmill, John.

    Palliative Surgery. ed. / Matthias W. Wichmann; Guy Maddern. Heidelberg : Springer, Springer Nature, 2014. p. 3-7.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearch

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Surgery and palliative care

    T2 - Is there common ground or simply a clash of cultures?

    AU - Currow, David C.

    AU - Cartmill, John

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - The goal of clinical medicine is to improve or maintain the best possible health and well-being. An intervention is palliative when the primary aim is to optimise function or comfort without an expectation that the course of the illness will be changed. The philosophy of surgery is predicated on a localised, biomechanical intervention at a single point in time, often with an optimism focusing on what could be achieved. Conditions with potential surgical interventions that develop in advanced disease have widely varying manifestations and progression, making studies difficult, leading to greater reliance on clinical intuition for decision-making. The person's premorbid level of function, and the likelihood that any intervention will help them to return to, or maintain, better function, becomes the measures for decisions when considering palliative interventions. Principles include: Do no harm as surgery is trauma and, in someone with progressive, irreversible cachexia, anything that accelerates his/her deterioration is likely to compound disease progression even when minimally invasive. Just because something could be done does not mean that it should be done.

    AB - The goal of clinical medicine is to improve or maintain the best possible health and well-being. An intervention is palliative when the primary aim is to optimise function or comfort without an expectation that the course of the illness will be changed. The philosophy of surgery is predicated on a localised, biomechanical intervention at a single point in time, often with an optimism focusing on what could be achieved. Conditions with potential surgical interventions that develop in advanced disease have widely varying manifestations and progression, making studies difficult, leading to greater reliance on clinical intuition for decision-making. The person's premorbid level of function, and the likelihood that any intervention will help them to return to, or maintain, better function, becomes the measures for decisions when considering palliative interventions. Principles include: Do no harm as surgery is trauma and, in someone with progressive, irreversible cachexia, anything that accelerates his/her deterioration is likely to compound disease progression even when minimally invasive. Just because something could be done does not mean that it should be done.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930589713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-53709-7_1

    DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-53709-7_1

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 3642537081

    SN - 9783642537080

    SP - 3

    EP - 7

    BT - Palliative Surgery

    A2 - Wichmann, Matthias W.

    A2 - Maddern, Guy

    PB - Springer, Springer Nature

    CY - Heidelberg

    ER -

    Currow DC, Cartmill J. Surgery and palliative care: Is there common ground or simply a clash of cultures? In Wichmann MW, Maddern G, editors, Palliative Surgery. Heidelberg: Springer, Springer Nature. 2014. p. 3-7 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53709-7_1