Surgical site infection: a population-based study in Australian adults measuring the compliance with and correct timing of appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis

T. D. Hooper, P. D. Hibbert, N. A. Hannaford, N. Jackson, D. M. Hindmarsh, D. L. Gordon, E. C. Coiera, W. B. Runciman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Prophylaxis for surgical site infection (SSI) is often at variance with guidelines, despite the prevalence of SSI and its associated cost, morbidity, and mortality. The CareTrack Australia study, undertaken by a number of the authors, demonstrated that appropriate care (in line with evidence- or consensus-based guidelines) was provided at 38% of eligible SSI healthcare encounters. Here, we report the indicator-level CareTrack Australia findings for SSI prophylaxis. Indicators were extracted from Australian and international clinical guidelines and ratified by clinical experts. A sample designed to be representative of the Australian population was recruited (n=1154). Participants' medical records were reviewed and analysed for compliance with the five SSI indicators. The main outcome measure was the percentage of eligible healthcare encounters with documented compliance with indicators for appropriate SSI prophylaxis. Of the 35,145 CareTrack Australia encounters, 702 (2%) were eligible for scoring against the SSI indicators. Where antibiotics were recommended, compliance was 49% for contaminated surgery, 57% for clean-contaminated surgery and 85% for surgery involving a prosthesis: these fell to 8%, 10% and 14%, respectively (an average of 11%), when currently recommended timing of antibiotic administration was included. Where antibiotics were not indicated, 72% of patients still received them. SSI prophylaxis in our sample was poor; over two-thirds of patients were given antibiotics, whether indicated or not, mainly at the wrong time. There is a need for national agreement on clinical standards, indicators and tools to guide, document and monitor SSI prophylaxis, with both local and national measures to increase and monitor their uptake.

LanguageEnglish
Pages461-467
Number of pages7
JournalAnaesthesia and Intensive Care
Volume43
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Surgical Wound Infection
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Population
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Guidelines
Delivery of Health Care
Compliance
Prostheses and Implants
Medical Records
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Morbidity
Costs and Cost Analysis

Cite this

Hooper, T. D. ; Hibbert, P. D. ; Hannaford, N. A. ; Jackson, N. ; Hindmarsh, D. M. ; Gordon, D. L. ; Coiera, E. C. ; Runciman, W. B. / Surgical site infection : a population-based study in Australian adults measuring the compliance with and correct timing of appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis. In: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 2015 ; Vol. 43, No. 4. pp. 461-467.
@article{2a019f409c604f1ab6c2fdf404b380cd,
title = "Surgical site infection: a population-based study in Australian adults measuring the compliance with and correct timing of appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis",
abstract = "Prophylaxis for surgical site infection (SSI) is often at variance with guidelines, despite the prevalence of SSI and its associated cost, morbidity, and mortality. The CareTrack Australia study, undertaken by a number of the authors, demonstrated that appropriate care (in line with evidence- or consensus-based guidelines) was provided at 38{\%} of eligible SSI healthcare encounters. Here, we report the indicator-level CareTrack Australia findings for SSI prophylaxis. Indicators were extracted from Australian and international clinical guidelines and ratified by clinical experts. A sample designed to be representative of the Australian population was recruited (n=1154). Participants' medical records were reviewed and analysed for compliance with the five SSI indicators. The main outcome measure was the percentage of eligible healthcare encounters with documented compliance with indicators for appropriate SSI prophylaxis. Of the 35,145 CareTrack Australia encounters, 702 (2{\%}) were eligible for scoring against the SSI indicators. Where antibiotics were recommended, compliance was 49{\%} for contaminated surgery, 57{\%} for clean-contaminated surgery and 85{\%} for surgery involving a prosthesis: these fell to 8{\%}, 10{\%} and 14{\%}, respectively (an average of 11{\%}), when currently recommended timing of antibiotic administration was included. Where antibiotics were not indicated, 72{\%} of patients still received them. SSI prophylaxis in our sample was poor; over two-thirds of patients were given antibiotics, whether indicated or not, mainly at the wrong time. There is a need for national agreement on clinical standards, indicators and tools to guide, document and monitor SSI prophylaxis, with both local and national measures to increase and monitor their uptake.",
author = "Hooper, {T. D.} and Hibbert, {P. D.} and Hannaford, {N. A.} and N. Jackson and Hindmarsh, {D. M.} and Gordon, {D. L.} and Coiera, {E. C.} and Runciman, {W. B.}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0310057X1504300407",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "461--467",
journal = "Anaesthesia and Intensive Care",
issn = "0310-057X",
publisher = "Australian Society of Anaesthetists",
number = "4",

}

Surgical site infection : a population-based study in Australian adults measuring the compliance with and correct timing of appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis. / Hooper, T. D.; Hibbert, P. D.; Hannaford, N. A.; Jackson, N.; Hindmarsh, D. M.; Gordon, D. L.; Coiera, E. C.; Runciman, W. B.

In: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Vol. 43, No. 4, 01.07.2015, p. 461-467.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical site infection

T2 - Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

AU - Hooper, T. D.

AU - Hibbert, P. D.

AU - Hannaford, N. A.

AU - Jackson, N.

AU - Hindmarsh, D. M.

AU - Gordon, D. L.

AU - Coiera, E. C.

AU - Runciman, W. B.

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Prophylaxis for surgical site infection (SSI) is often at variance with guidelines, despite the prevalence of SSI and its associated cost, morbidity, and mortality. The CareTrack Australia study, undertaken by a number of the authors, demonstrated that appropriate care (in line with evidence- or consensus-based guidelines) was provided at 38% of eligible SSI healthcare encounters. Here, we report the indicator-level CareTrack Australia findings for SSI prophylaxis. Indicators were extracted from Australian and international clinical guidelines and ratified by clinical experts. A sample designed to be representative of the Australian population was recruited (n=1154). Participants' medical records were reviewed and analysed for compliance with the five SSI indicators. The main outcome measure was the percentage of eligible healthcare encounters with documented compliance with indicators for appropriate SSI prophylaxis. Of the 35,145 CareTrack Australia encounters, 702 (2%) were eligible for scoring against the SSI indicators. Where antibiotics were recommended, compliance was 49% for contaminated surgery, 57% for clean-contaminated surgery and 85% for surgery involving a prosthesis: these fell to 8%, 10% and 14%, respectively (an average of 11%), when currently recommended timing of antibiotic administration was included. Where antibiotics were not indicated, 72% of patients still received them. SSI prophylaxis in our sample was poor; over two-thirds of patients were given antibiotics, whether indicated or not, mainly at the wrong time. There is a need for national agreement on clinical standards, indicators and tools to guide, document and monitor SSI prophylaxis, with both local and national measures to increase and monitor their uptake.

AB - Prophylaxis for surgical site infection (SSI) is often at variance with guidelines, despite the prevalence of SSI and its associated cost, morbidity, and mortality. The CareTrack Australia study, undertaken by a number of the authors, demonstrated that appropriate care (in line with evidence- or consensus-based guidelines) was provided at 38% of eligible SSI healthcare encounters. Here, we report the indicator-level CareTrack Australia findings for SSI prophylaxis. Indicators were extracted from Australian and international clinical guidelines and ratified by clinical experts. A sample designed to be representative of the Australian population was recruited (n=1154). Participants' medical records were reviewed and analysed for compliance with the five SSI indicators. The main outcome measure was the percentage of eligible healthcare encounters with documented compliance with indicators for appropriate SSI prophylaxis. Of the 35,145 CareTrack Australia encounters, 702 (2%) were eligible for scoring against the SSI indicators. Where antibiotics were recommended, compliance was 49% for contaminated surgery, 57% for clean-contaminated surgery and 85% for surgery involving a prosthesis: these fell to 8%, 10% and 14%, respectively (an average of 11%), when currently recommended timing of antibiotic administration was included. Where antibiotics were not indicated, 72% of patients still received them. SSI prophylaxis in our sample was poor; over two-thirds of patients were given antibiotics, whether indicated or not, mainly at the wrong time. There is a need for national agreement on clinical standards, indicators and tools to guide, document and monitor SSI prophylaxis, with both local and national measures to increase and monitor their uptake.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84936757474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/568612

U2 - 10.1177/0310057X1504300407

DO - 10.1177/0310057X1504300407

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 461

EP - 467

JO - Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

JF - Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

SN - 0310-057X

IS - 4

ER -