Abstract
Background: Advanced-stage olfactory neuroblastoma requires multimodal therapy for optimal outcomes. Debate exists over endoscopic endonasal surgery in this situation. Stage-matched open and endoscopic surgical therapy were compared. Methods: Patients from 6 cancer institutions were assessed. Stratification included dural involvement, Kadish stage, nodal disease, Hyams' grade, approach, and margin status. At follow-up, local control, nodal status, and evidence of distant metastases were recorded with any subsequent therapy. Statistical analyses to identify risk factors for developing recurrence and survival differences were performed. Results: One hundred nine patients were assessed (age 49.2 ± 13.0 years; 46% women) representing Kadish A stage (10%), Kadish B stage (25%), and Kadish C stage (65%). The majority of the patients (61.5%) underwent endoscopic resection, 53.5% within Kadish C stage. Within-stage survival analysis favored endoscopic subgroup for Kadish C stage (log-rank P = .017) nonsignificant for Kadish B stage (log-rank P = .39). Conclusion: Stage-matched survival was better for the endoscopically treated group compared to the open surgery group, with high negative margin resections obtained.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2425-2432 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Head and Neck |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| Early online date | 25 Sept 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2017 |
Keywords
- Endoscopy
- Esthesioneuroblastoma
- Metastases
- Outcomes
- Radiotherapy
- Surgery
- Survival
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Survival outcomes for stage-matched endoscopic and open resection of olfactory neuroblastoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver