Talking to the beat: six-year-olds' use of stroke-defined non-referential gestures

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Children are known to use different types of referential gestures (e.g., deictic, iconic) from a very young age. In contrast, their use of non-referential gestures is not well established. This study investigated the use of stroke-defined non-referential ‘beat’ gestures in a story-retelling and an exposition task by twelve 6-year-olds, an age at which proficiency in discourse is beginning to develop. The goals of the study were to (1) establish if children this age use stroke-defined beats, (2) determine whether the two discourse types influence the incidence of stroke-defined beats, and (3) examine the extent to which stroke-defined beats co-occur with lexical words or pitch accents. The results showed that nine of the children produced at least one beat gesture with a well-defined stroke phase, and that the frequency of the stroke-defined beat gesture use did not differ significantly between the two tasks. Stroke-defined beats occurred more often on lexical words than function words, but they did not co-occur more often with a pitch accent, suggesting its potential link with pitch accents for emphasis. This study therefore provides support for children’s ‘prosodic’ use of gesture – a function which may become more common as discourse abilities develop.
LanguageEnglish
Pages111-128
Number of pages18
JournalFirst Language
Volume38
Issue number2
Early online date25 Oct 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

stroke
discourse
Gesture
incidence
ability
Pitch Accent

Keywords

  • discourse
  • emphasis
  • gestural development
  • gesture–speech relationship
  • stroke-defined beats

Cite this

@article{c6baebf377b746a6a0e79d91c0af90c0,
title = "Talking to the beat: six-year-olds' use of stroke-defined non-referential gestures",
abstract = "Children are known to use different types of referential gestures (e.g., deictic, iconic) from a very young age. In contrast, their use of non-referential gestures is not well established. This study investigated the use of stroke-defined non-referential ‘beat’ gestures in a story-retelling and an exposition task by twelve 6-year-olds, an age at which proficiency in discourse is beginning to develop. The goals of the study were to (1) establish if children this age use stroke-defined beats, (2) determine whether the two discourse types influence the incidence of stroke-defined beats, and (3) examine the extent to which stroke-defined beats co-occur with lexical words or pitch accents. The results showed that nine of the children produced at least one beat gesture with a well-defined stroke phase, and that the frequency of the stroke-defined beat gesture use did not differ significantly between the two tasks. Stroke-defined beats occurred more often on lexical words than function words, but they did not co-occur more often with a pitch accent, suggesting its potential link with pitch accents for emphasis. This study therefore provides support for children’s ‘prosodic’ use of gesture – a function which may become more common as discourse abilities develop.",
keywords = "discourse, emphasis, gestural development, gesture–speech relationship, stroke-defined beats",
author = "Mili Mathew and Ivan Yuen and Katherine Demuth",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0142723717734949",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "111--128",
journal = "First Language",
issn = "0142-7237",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "2",

}

Talking to the beat : six-year-olds' use of stroke-defined non-referential gestures. / Mathew, Mili; Yuen, Ivan; Demuth, Katherine.

In: First Language, Vol. 38, No. 2, 01.04.2018, p. 111-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Talking to the beat

T2 - First Language

AU - Mathew, Mili

AU - Yuen, Ivan

AU - Demuth, Katherine

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Children are known to use different types of referential gestures (e.g., deictic, iconic) from a very young age. In contrast, their use of non-referential gestures is not well established. This study investigated the use of stroke-defined non-referential ‘beat’ gestures in a story-retelling and an exposition task by twelve 6-year-olds, an age at which proficiency in discourse is beginning to develop. The goals of the study were to (1) establish if children this age use stroke-defined beats, (2) determine whether the two discourse types influence the incidence of stroke-defined beats, and (3) examine the extent to which stroke-defined beats co-occur with lexical words or pitch accents. The results showed that nine of the children produced at least one beat gesture with a well-defined stroke phase, and that the frequency of the stroke-defined beat gesture use did not differ significantly between the two tasks. Stroke-defined beats occurred more often on lexical words than function words, but they did not co-occur more often with a pitch accent, suggesting its potential link with pitch accents for emphasis. This study therefore provides support for children’s ‘prosodic’ use of gesture – a function which may become more common as discourse abilities develop.

AB - Children are known to use different types of referential gestures (e.g., deictic, iconic) from a very young age. In contrast, their use of non-referential gestures is not well established. This study investigated the use of stroke-defined non-referential ‘beat’ gestures in a story-retelling and an exposition task by twelve 6-year-olds, an age at which proficiency in discourse is beginning to develop. The goals of the study were to (1) establish if children this age use stroke-defined beats, (2) determine whether the two discourse types influence the incidence of stroke-defined beats, and (3) examine the extent to which stroke-defined beats co-occur with lexical words or pitch accents. The results showed that nine of the children produced at least one beat gesture with a well-defined stroke phase, and that the frequency of the stroke-defined beat gesture use did not differ significantly between the two tasks. Stroke-defined beats occurred more often on lexical words than function words, but they did not co-occur more often with a pitch accent, suggesting its potential link with pitch accents for emphasis. This study therefore provides support for children’s ‘prosodic’ use of gesture – a function which may become more common as discourse abilities develop.

KW - discourse

KW - emphasis

KW - gestural development

KW - gesture–speech relationship

KW - stroke-defined beats

UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/CE110001021

UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FL130100014

U2 - 10.1177/0142723717734949

DO - 10.1177/0142723717734949

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 111

EP - 128

JO - First Language

JF - First Language

SN - 0142-7237

IS - 2

ER -