Temporary labour migration and underdevelopment in Sri Lanka: the limits of remittance capital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Sri Lanka’s long history of temporary labour migration to West Asia began amidst economic upheaval in 1977 and burgeoned during decades marred by macroeconomic volatility and ethnic conflict. Today, the remittances sent by migrant domestic workers and low-waged manual labourers in the Gulf are vital to the subsistence of poor households in marginalised communities and constitute the country’s largest source of foreign exchange earnings. Prominent policymaking frameworks purport that temporary labour migration of this kind should produce a ‘triple win’ outcome, wherein remittance transfers catalyse economic development for migrant households and their countries of origin. Yet, while labour-receiving economies unequivocally benefit from exploiting reserve armies of labour and care, the developmental impact of inbound remittance flows remains under-theorised. This article advances a critique of how remittance capital functions at household, national and global scales to demonstrate how temporary labour migration has limited Sri Lanka to a precariously uneven and remittance-dependent model of development. A profound contradiction emerges where uneven development ‘pushes’ vulnerable populations into foreign employment, only for their remittances to sustain exclusionary development spending that intensifies the need to migrate.
LanguageEnglish
Pages418-436
Number of pages19
JournalMigration and Development
Volume8
Issue number3
Early online date7 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

underdevelopment
labor migration
Sri Lanka
migrant
labor
ethnic conflict
foreign exchange
country of origin
macroeconomics
military
economics
worker
economy
history
community

Keywords

  • remittances
  • temporary labour migration
  • uneven development
  • migration-development
  • Sri Lanka

Cite this

@article{658f6c7dd3ce4ad29f8200eb4ebff2e9,
title = "Temporary labour migration and underdevelopment in Sri Lanka: the limits of remittance capital",
abstract = "Sri Lanka’s long history of temporary labour migration to West Asia began amidst economic upheaval in 1977 and burgeoned during decades marred by macroeconomic volatility and ethnic conflict. Today, the remittances sent by migrant domestic workers and low-waged manual labourers in the Gulf are vital to the subsistence of poor households in marginalised communities and constitute the country’s largest source of foreign exchange earnings. Prominent policymaking frameworks purport that temporary labour migration of this kind should produce a ‘triple win’ outcome, wherein remittance transfers catalyse economic development for migrant households and their countries of origin. Yet, while labour-receiving economies unequivocally benefit from exploiting reserve armies of labour and care, the developmental impact of inbound remittance flows remains under-theorised. This article advances a critique of how remittance capital functions at household, national and global scales to demonstrate how temporary labour migration has limited Sri Lanka to a precariously uneven and remittance-dependent model of development. A profound contradiction emerges where uneven development ‘pushes’ vulnerable populations into foreign employment, only for their remittances to sustain exclusionary development spending that intensifies the need to migrate.",
keywords = "remittances, temporary labour migration, uneven development, migration-development, Sri Lanka",
author = "Matt Withers",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/21632324.2019.1568701",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "418--436",
journal = "Migration and Development",
issn = "2163-2324",
publisher = "Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group",
number = "3",

}

Temporary labour migration and underdevelopment in Sri Lanka : the limits of remittance capital. / Withers, Matt.

In: Migration and Development, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2019, p. 418-436.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Temporary labour migration and underdevelopment in Sri Lanka

T2 - Migration and Development

AU - Withers, Matt

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Sri Lanka’s long history of temporary labour migration to West Asia began amidst economic upheaval in 1977 and burgeoned during decades marred by macroeconomic volatility and ethnic conflict. Today, the remittances sent by migrant domestic workers and low-waged manual labourers in the Gulf are vital to the subsistence of poor households in marginalised communities and constitute the country’s largest source of foreign exchange earnings. Prominent policymaking frameworks purport that temporary labour migration of this kind should produce a ‘triple win’ outcome, wherein remittance transfers catalyse economic development for migrant households and their countries of origin. Yet, while labour-receiving economies unequivocally benefit from exploiting reserve armies of labour and care, the developmental impact of inbound remittance flows remains under-theorised. This article advances a critique of how remittance capital functions at household, national and global scales to demonstrate how temporary labour migration has limited Sri Lanka to a precariously uneven and remittance-dependent model of development. A profound contradiction emerges where uneven development ‘pushes’ vulnerable populations into foreign employment, only for their remittances to sustain exclusionary development spending that intensifies the need to migrate.

AB - Sri Lanka’s long history of temporary labour migration to West Asia began amidst economic upheaval in 1977 and burgeoned during decades marred by macroeconomic volatility and ethnic conflict. Today, the remittances sent by migrant domestic workers and low-waged manual labourers in the Gulf are vital to the subsistence of poor households in marginalised communities and constitute the country’s largest source of foreign exchange earnings. Prominent policymaking frameworks purport that temporary labour migration of this kind should produce a ‘triple win’ outcome, wherein remittance transfers catalyse economic development for migrant households and their countries of origin. Yet, while labour-receiving economies unequivocally benefit from exploiting reserve armies of labour and care, the developmental impact of inbound remittance flows remains under-theorised. This article advances a critique of how remittance capital functions at household, national and global scales to demonstrate how temporary labour migration has limited Sri Lanka to a precariously uneven and remittance-dependent model of development. A profound contradiction emerges where uneven development ‘pushes’ vulnerable populations into foreign employment, only for their remittances to sustain exclusionary development spending that intensifies the need to migrate.

KW - remittances

KW - temporary labour migration

KW - uneven development

KW - migration-development

KW - Sri Lanka

U2 - 10.1080/21632324.2019.1568701

DO - 10.1080/21632324.2019.1568701

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 418

EP - 436

JO - Migration and Development

JF - Migration and Development

SN - 2163-2324

IS - 3

ER -