TY - JOUR
T1 - That's not my arm
T2 - A hypnotic analogue of somatoparaphrenia
AU - Rahmanovic, Alena
AU - Barnier, Amanda J.
AU - Cox, Rochelle E.
AU - Langdon, Robyn A.
AU - Coltheart, Max
PY - 2012/1/1
Y1 - 2012/1/1
N2 - Introduction. Instrumental hypnosis allows researchers to model clinical symptoms in the laboratory, creating virtual patients with reversible disturbances in, for example, perception, action, memory, or belief. We used hypnosis to temporarily recreate somatoparaphrenia, a delusional belief that one's own limb belongs to someone else. Methods. We compared a Fully Formed somatoparaphrenia suggestion with a Factor 1 + Factor 2 suggestion that attempted to generate the delusional belief from analogues of its hypothesised underlying factors (i.e., paralysis plus disrupted critical belief evaluation). We tested and then challenged subjects responses to these suggestions. Results. Although many hypnotic subjects experienced temporary paralysis, only a minority claimed their arm did not belong to them. Notably, the Fully Formed suggestion was more successful in recreating features of somatoparaphrenia than the Factor 1 + Factor 2 suggestion. In response to the challenges, some of those who developed temporary somatoparaphrenia maintained their belief throughout the hypnosis session. Conclusions. We discuss these findings in terms of the two-factor theory of delusions and we highlight the advantages versus disadvantages of using hypnosis to explore such delusional beliefs in the laboratory.
AB - Introduction. Instrumental hypnosis allows researchers to model clinical symptoms in the laboratory, creating virtual patients with reversible disturbances in, for example, perception, action, memory, or belief. We used hypnosis to temporarily recreate somatoparaphrenia, a delusional belief that one's own limb belongs to someone else. Methods. We compared a Fully Formed somatoparaphrenia suggestion with a Factor 1 + Factor 2 suggestion that attempted to generate the delusional belief from analogues of its hypothesised underlying factors (i.e., paralysis plus disrupted critical belief evaluation). We tested and then challenged subjects responses to these suggestions. Results. Although many hypnotic subjects experienced temporary paralysis, only a minority claimed their arm did not belong to them. Notably, the Fully Formed suggestion was more successful in recreating features of somatoparaphrenia than the Factor 1 + Factor 2 suggestion. In response to the challenges, some of those who developed temporary somatoparaphrenia maintained their belief throughout the hypnosis session. Conclusions. We discuss these findings in terms of the two-factor theory of delusions and we highlight the advantages versus disadvantages of using hypnosis to explore such delusional beliefs in the laboratory.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856334827&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13546805.2011.564925
DO - 10.1080/13546805.2011.564925
M3 - Article
C2 - 21623487
AN - SCOPUS:84856334827
VL - 17
SP - 36
EP - 63
JO - Cognitive Neuropsychiatry
JF - Cognitive Neuropsychiatry
SN - 1354-6805
IS - 1
ER -