Abstract
Increasing interest in experience based learning (EBL), and work-integrated learning (WIL) in particular, by the higher education sector has generated much debate over what constitutes WIL and the types of activities that characterise it. Placement activities undertaken off-campus are the most widely reported and accepted form of work/community related learning. However, in response to broadening conceptualisations of WIL and various forms of EBL, increasing competition for places and other drivers, universities are considering the use of a wider range of activities than before. This paper considers the following questions: What is an acceptable WIL activity? What are the boundaries? Do activities such as virtual projects, simulations and job readiness programs have advantages over placements for some situations and outcomes? Through a review of the literature of 255 sources including academic papers and vignettes, the authors develop a typology of WIL activities. The typology is discussed within the context of benefits and drawbacks of placements versus other types of participation activities.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | ACEN 2012 |
Subtitle of host publication | Proceedings of the 2012 Australian Collaborative Education Network National Conference : Collaborative Education : Investing in the Future |
Editors | Matthew Campbell |
Place of Publication | Sprinvale, VIC |
Publisher | Australian Collaborative Education Network (ACEN) |
Pages | 246-252 |
Number of pages | 7 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780980570625 |
Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Event | Australian Collaborative Education Network National Conference - Geelong, VIC Duration: 29 Oct 2012 → 2 Nov 2012 |
Conference
Conference | Australian Collaborative Education Network National Conference |
---|---|
City | Geelong, VIC |
Period | 29/10/12 → 2/11/12 |
Keywords
- placements
- typology of WIL activities
- work-integrated learning