The accrual anomaly: Australian evidence

Greg Clinch*, Damian Fuller, Brett Govendir, Peter Wells

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)


This paper investigates whether there is evidence of the accrual anomaly (Sloan, 1996) in Australia, whereby investors overestimate the impact of accruals on the persistence of earnings. While our results provide general support for the existence of the anomaly in Australia, there are a number of idiosyncrasies. First, there is evidence of Australian investors underestimating the persistence of earnings. Second, there is evidence of investors incorrectly assessing the implications of accruals and cash flows for the persistence of earnings (i.e. an accrual anomaly and a cash-flow anomaly). Third, returns to a hedged portfolio trading strategy based on reported accruals are decreasing over the three-year period subsequent to portfolio formation. Furthermore, they are statistically significant only in the first year. Additional analysis of the hedge portfolio results indicates that these results are primarily attributable to a limited number of firm-year observations in the extreme positive tail of returns.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)377-394
Number of pages18
JournalAccounting and Finance
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2012
Externally publishedYes


  • Accrual anomaly
  • Financial reporting


Dive into the research topics of 'The accrual anomaly: Australian evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this