Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

"The agenda is to wipe out critical thought"—Struggles for academic freedom (part 2)

Eve Darian-Smith*, Virginia R. Dominguez, Susanna Trnka, Jesse Hession Grayman, L. L. Wynn

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In the second of two interviews with leading anthropologists focused on academic freedom, the editors of American Ethnologist speak with Eve Darian-Smith (University of California, Irvine) and Virginia R. Dominguez (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign). Darian-Smith recently published Policing Higher Education, and Dominguez has addressed academic freedom through her work with the World Anthropological Union and the International Union of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences. This discussion centers on recent (2024-25) attacks on critical thought at United States tertiary institutions, situating them within longer histories of repression (e.g., the McCarthy era) and the global situation. Darian-Smith and Dominguez explore distinctions between free speech and academic freedom, arguing that the present political moment constitutes an unprecedented assault on higher education and research. They highlight how anthropology programs and cognate disciplines are especially vulnerable and discuss less visible modes of suppression, including digital surveillance, academic precarity, and weak collective organizing, while also pointing to tools and strategies for resistance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)334-339
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Ethnologist
Volume52
Issue number3
Early online dateJul 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2025

Keywords

  • United States
  • Academic freedom
  • Activism
  • Censorship
  • Collective organizing
  • Critical thinking
  • Diversity, equity, and inclusion
  • Free speech
  • Higher education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '"The agenda is to wipe out critical thought"—Struggles for academic freedom (part 2)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this