The Australian party system, Pauline Hanson's One Nation, and the party cartelisation thesis

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    This chapter is concerned with the argument that the major parties have combined since the 1970s to make conditions for minor parties increasingly difficult. More particularly it is concerned with establishing whether the emergence of Pauline Hanson's One Nation can be understood as representing a revolt against all of this; a central correlate of the cartel model is that it should. To see whether the theory of the cartel illuminates the Hanson phenomenon the chapter considers both the extent to which the parties have behaved as a cartel, and the nature of the One Nation challenge, across each of the domains covered by Katz and Mair: ideological, electoral and organisational. It argues that the cartel thesis does not offer a persuasive account of the political conditions that gave rise to One Nation or of the hurdles the new party had to face. More generally, the chapter casts doubt on the validity of the thesis when applied to developments in the Australian party system.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationPolitical parties in transition?
    Place of PublicationAnnandale, NSW
    PublisherThe Federation Press
    Pages181-217
    Number of pages37
    ISBN (Print)1862875936
    Publication statusPublished - 2006

    Keywords

    • political parties, Australia.
    • government, Australia

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Australian party system, Pauline Hanson's One Nation, and the party cartelisation thesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this