'The birthplace of Australian multiculturalism?' Retrospective commemoration, participatory memoralisation and official heritage

Paul Ashton*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Australia, the authorised heritage discourse contributes to shaping the stereotypically Australian. It actively engages in creating a contemporary national story which glosses over the more shameful or distasteful episodes and themes in Australian colonial and post-colonial history which is presented as being by-and-large progressive and benign. While the process of forging national history has become more complex and increasingly fraught, given globalisation and the emergence of new histories, nation and nationalism remain culturally persistent. The turn to multiculturalism from the 1970s as the principal way of defining Australianness and the nation lead some conservatives in politics and the heritage industry to appropriate the new social history, using it to present diversity as an indicator of a fair and open society. In this process, both history - an evolving academic discipline - and the past - lived experience which has meanings and uses in the present - were transformed into heritage.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)381-398
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Heritage Studies
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Australian history
  • Commemoration
  • Heritage
  • Memorials
  • Multiculturalism
  • Public history

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of ''The birthplace of Australian multiculturalism?' Retrospective commemoration, participatory memoralisation and official heritage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this