The burden of mild asthma: clinical burden and healthcare resource utilisation in the NOVELTY study

Sarowar Muhammad Golam, Christer Janson, Richard Beasley, J. Mark FitzGerald, Tim Harrison, Bradley Chipps, Rod Hughes, Hana Müllerová, José María Olaguibel, Eleni Rapsomaniki, Helen K. Reddel, Mohsen Sadatsafavi, NOVELTY investigators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
55 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Patients with mild asthma represent a substantial proportion of the population with asthma, yet there are limited data on their true burden of disease. We aimed to describe the clinical and healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) burden of physician-assessed mild asthma.

Methods: Patients with mild asthma were included from the NOVEL observational longiTudinal studY (NOVELTY; NCT02760329), a global, 3-year, real-world prospective study of patients with asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from community practice (specialised and primary care). Diagnosis and severity were based on physician discretion. Clinical burden included physician-reported exacerbations and patient-reported measures. HCRU included inpatient and outpatient visits.

Results: Overall, 2004 patients with mild asthma were included; 22.8% experienced ≥1 exacerbation in the previous 12 months, of whom 72.3% experienced ≥1 severe exacerbation. Of 625 exacerbations reported, 48.0% lasted >1 week, 27.7% were preceded by symptomatic worsening lasting >3 days, and 50.1% required oral corticosteroid treatment. Health status was moderately impacted (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score: 23.5 [standard deviation ± 17.9]). At baseline, 29.7% of patients had asthma symptoms that were not well controlled or very poorly controlled (Asthma Control Test score <20), increasing to 55.6% for those with ≥2 exacerbations in the previous year. In terms of HCRU, at least one unscheduled ambulatory visit for exacerbations was required by 9.5% of patients, including 9.2% requiring ≥1 emergency department visit and 1.1% requiring ≥1 hospital admission.

Conclusions: In this global sample representing community practice, a significant proportion of patients with physician-assessed mild asthma had considerable clinical burden and HCRU.

Original languageEnglish
Article number106863
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalRespiratory Medicine
Volume200
Early online date9 May 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Aug 2022

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2022. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • Disease burden
  • Healthcare resource utilisation
  • Longitudinal studies
  • Mild asthma
  • Patient-reported measures

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The burden of mild asthma: clinical burden and healthcare resource utilisation in the NOVELTY study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this