Abstract
This review discusses several kinds of linguistic generalizations that pose a challenge for the constructionist approach to linguistic generalizations advocated by Adele Goldberg. It is difficult to see, for example, how such an account can explain the wide-ranging linguistic phenomena governed by structural properties, such as c-command, or semantic properties, such as downward entailment. We also argue against Goldberg's rejection of formal semantics in favour of an account of meaning based primarily on information structure and discourse function.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 145-155 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Cognitive Linguistics |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Feb 2009 |