The collective dimension of federal anti-discrimination proceedings in Australia: shifting the burden from individual litigants

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The burden of pursuing federal anti-discrimination proceedings in Australia is essentially an individual one, with little regard to the collective dimension of such claims. This is reflected in the narrow approach to standing for organizations with established interests in areas affected by such claims, the scarcity of representative proceedings for breaches of federal anti-discrimination law legislation, and the lack of capacity on the part of the national human rights agency to pursue test case litigation or provide advice or support to individual complainants. In exploring these three key areas, this article highlights the shortcomings of the Australian regulatory approach and its failure to provide adequate mechanisms for redress that recognize the broader community concern in ensuring that discriminatory practices are identified and addressed.
LanguageEnglish
Pages22-39
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Discrimination and the Law
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

affirmative action
human rights
legislation
Law
lack
community

Keywords

  • anti-discrimiantion proceedings
  • individual complainants
  • standing
  • representative proceedings
  • human rights agencies

Cite this

@article{85c42319819d428795b8e92ef29610bc,
title = "The collective dimension of federal anti-discrimination proceedings in Australia: shifting the burden from individual litigants",
abstract = "The burden of pursuing federal anti-discrimination proceedings in Australia is essentially an individual one, with little regard to the collective dimension of such claims. This is reflected in the narrow approach to standing for organizations with established interests in areas affected by such claims, the scarcity of representative proceedings for breaches of federal anti-discrimination law legislation, and the lack of capacity on the part of the national human rights agency to pursue test case litigation or provide advice or support to individual complainants. In exploring these three key areas, this article highlights the shortcomings of the Australian regulatory approach and its failure to provide adequate mechanisms for redress that recognize the broader community concern in ensuring that discriminatory practices are identified and addressed.",
keywords = "anti-discrimiantion proceedings, individual complainants, standing, representative proceedings, human rights agencies",
author = "Therese MacDermott",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1177/1358229118759712",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "22--39",
journal = "International Journal of Discrimination and the Law",
issn = "1358-2291",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The collective dimension of federal anti-discrimination proceedings in Australia

T2 - International Journal of Discrimination and the Law

AU - MacDermott, Therese

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The burden of pursuing federal anti-discrimination proceedings in Australia is essentially an individual one, with little regard to the collective dimension of such claims. This is reflected in the narrow approach to standing for organizations with established interests in areas affected by such claims, the scarcity of representative proceedings for breaches of federal anti-discrimination law legislation, and the lack of capacity on the part of the national human rights agency to pursue test case litigation or provide advice or support to individual complainants. In exploring these three key areas, this article highlights the shortcomings of the Australian regulatory approach and its failure to provide adequate mechanisms for redress that recognize the broader community concern in ensuring that discriminatory practices are identified and addressed.

AB - The burden of pursuing federal anti-discrimination proceedings in Australia is essentially an individual one, with little regard to the collective dimension of such claims. This is reflected in the narrow approach to standing for organizations with established interests in areas affected by such claims, the scarcity of representative proceedings for breaches of federal anti-discrimination law legislation, and the lack of capacity on the part of the national human rights agency to pursue test case litigation or provide advice or support to individual complainants. In exploring these three key areas, this article highlights the shortcomings of the Australian regulatory approach and its failure to provide adequate mechanisms for redress that recognize the broader community concern in ensuring that discriminatory practices are identified and addressed.

KW - anti-discrimiantion proceedings

KW - individual complainants

KW - standing

KW - representative proceedings

KW - human rights agencies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056453775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1358229118759712

DO - 10.1177/1358229118759712

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 22

EP - 39

JO - International Journal of Discrimination and the Law

JF - International Journal of Discrimination and the Law

SN - 1358-2291

IS - 1

ER -