Abstract
This paper presents the hypothesis that concept possession is sufficient and necessary for self-consciousness. If this is true it provides a yardstick for gauging the validity of different research paradigms in which claims for self-consciousness in animals or human infants are made: a convincing demonstration of concept possession in a research subject, such as a display of inferential reasoning, may be taken as conclusive evidence of self-consciousness. Intuitively, there appears to be a correlation between intelligence in animals (which presupposes concept possession) and the existence of self-consciousness. I present three discussions to support the hypothesis: an analogy between perception and conception, where both are self-specifying; an argument that any web of concepts will always include the self-concept; and a fresh interpretation of Bermũdez (1998) showing how his theory of non-conceptual content provides strong support for the concept possession hypothesis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 713-720 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Consciousness and cognition |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Animal awareness
- Concept
- Intelligence
- Mental representation
- Non-conceptual content
- Self-awareness
- Self-consciousness
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Concept possession hypothesis of self-consciousness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver