The consequences of anthropomorphic and teleological beliefs in a global pandemic

Andrew J. Roberts*, Simon Handley, Vince Polito

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

To describe something in terms of its purpose or function is to describe its teleology. Previous studies have found that teleological beliefs are positively related to anthropomorphism, and that anthropomorphism decreases the perceived unpredictability of non-human agents. In the current study, we explore these relationships using the highly salient example of beliefs about the coronavirus pandemic. Results showed that both anthropomorphism and teleology were negatively associated with perceived uncertainty and threat, and positively associated with self-reported behavioural change in response to the pandemic. These findings suggest that highly anthropomorphic and teleological individuals may view coronavirus as agentive and goal-directed. While anthropomorphic and teleological beliefs may facilitate behavioural change in response to the pandemic, we also found that the associated reduction in uncertainty and threat may be detrimental to behavioural change. We discuss the implications of these findings for messaging about global events more broadly.

Original languageEnglish
Article number146
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalBehavioral Sciences
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Feb 2024

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2024. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • teleology
  • intentional stance
  • anthropomorphism
  • dual-process theory
  • coronavirus

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The consequences of anthropomorphic and teleological beliefs in a global pandemic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this