Abstract
This chapter aims to illuminate answers to two questions: whether there is convergence in the constitutional protection of economic and social rights in Latin American countries; and what can explain the existence or absence of convergence. I will argue that despite the convergence of Latin American constitutions in the entrenchment of economic and social rights under similar circumstances, an analysis of the case law of Latin American apex courts shows that there is only limited convergence and, correlatively, extended divergence concerning the standards of adjudication of those rights. While the beginning of a practice of intra-regional migration of constitutional ideas may account for the convergence, differences in the strength of the judiciary vis-à-vis political authorities may explain the divergence.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Comparative constitutional law in Latin America |
Editors | Rosalind Dixon, Tom Ginsburg |
Place of Publication | Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, USA |
Publisher | Edward Elgar Publishing |
Pages | 325-342 |
Number of pages | 18 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781785369216 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781785369209 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Keywords
- Constitutional review
- Constitutional rights
- Economic and social rights
- Minimum core
- Proportionality
- Reasonableness