The cost of conscience

Kant on conscience and conscientious objection

Jeanette Kennett*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The spread of demands by physicians and allied health professionals for accommodation of their private ethical, usually religiously based, objections to providing care of a particular type, or to a particular class of persons, suggests the need for a re-evaluation of conscientious objection in healthcare and how it should be regulated. I argue on Kantian grounds that respect for conscience and protection of freedom of conscience is consistent with fairly stringent limitations and regulations governing refusal of service in healthcare settings. Respect for conscience does not entail that refusal of service should be cost free to the objector. I suggest that conscientious objection in medicine should be conceptualized and treated analogously to civil disobedience.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-81
Number of pages13
JournalCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Keywords

  • civil disobedience
  • conscience
  • conscientious objection
  • critical conscience
  • Kant

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The cost of conscience: Kant on conscience and conscientious objection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this