The culture of moral disengagement and harm production in the City of London's financial services industry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Through Huggins et al.’s (2002) conceptualisation of violence work, the article presents the processes through which individuals and groups morally disengage from the production of social harm. In doing so, the article explores cultures of legitimation and moral disengagement that function within the City of London’s financial services industry. Despite the well documented nature of the harms emanating from finance, it is often difficult to see the human agency involved (Sarat and Culbert 2009). Consequently, there remains a lack of attention paid to the embedded cultures and rule systems that legitimise the production, opposed to impact, of social harm. Bringing into focus in embedded cultures and dominant rule systems that legitimise the production of social harm, the article highlights three themes of deniability: occupational insularity; a dominant regime of knowledge; and personal disengagement. Addressing each in turn, what emerges is the mundane ways in which finance workers enact, legitimise and reproduce the conditions of harm production in the course of their occupational life. The article turns the lens of critical inquiry from an impact agenda of social harm to a production agenda and offers a detailed understanding of the ways social harms are both produced and legitimised in the day-to-day functioning of occupational life.
LanguageEnglish
Pages115-133
JournalJustice, Power and Resistance
Volume3
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2019

Fingerprint

disengagement
financial service
industry
finance
legitimation
violence
worker
lack
knowledge
Group

Keywords

  • Violence work
  • City of London
  • Cultural finance studies
  • Ethnography
  • Moral disengagement
  • Harm production

Cite this

@article{8e82163ab27e45969fd23f88534b2b41,
title = "The culture of moral disengagement and harm production in the City of London's financial services industry",
abstract = "Through Huggins et al.’s (2002) conceptualisation of violence work, the article presents the processes through which individuals and groups morally disengage from the production of social harm. In doing so, the article explores cultures of legitimation and moral disengagement that function within the City of London’s financial services industry. Despite the well documented nature of the harms emanating from finance, it is often difficult to see the human agency involved (Sarat and Culbert 2009). Consequently, there remains a lack of attention paid to the embedded cultures and rule systems that legitimise the production, opposed to impact, of social harm. Bringing into focus in embedded cultures and dominant rule systems that legitimise the production of social harm, the article highlights three themes of deniability: occupational insularity; a dominant regime of knowledge; and personal disengagement. Addressing each in turn, what emerges is the mundane ways in which finance workers enact, legitimise and reproduce the conditions of harm production in the course of their occupational life. The article turns the lens of critical inquiry from an impact agenda of social harm to a production agenda and offers a detailed understanding of the ways social harms are both produced and legitimised in the day-to-day functioning of occupational life.",
keywords = "Violence work, City of London, Cultural finance studies, Ethnography, Moral disengagement, Harm production",
author = "Alex Simpson",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "115--133",
journal = "Justice, Power and Resistance",
issn = "2398-2764",
publisher = "EG Press",
number = "1",

}

The culture of moral disengagement and harm production in the City of London's financial services industry. / Simpson, Alex.

In: Justice, Power and Resistance, Vol. 3, No. 1, 04.2019, p. 115-133.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The culture of moral disengagement and harm production in the City of London's financial services industry

AU - Simpson, Alex

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - Through Huggins et al.’s (2002) conceptualisation of violence work, the article presents the processes through which individuals and groups morally disengage from the production of social harm. In doing so, the article explores cultures of legitimation and moral disengagement that function within the City of London’s financial services industry. Despite the well documented nature of the harms emanating from finance, it is often difficult to see the human agency involved (Sarat and Culbert 2009). Consequently, there remains a lack of attention paid to the embedded cultures and rule systems that legitimise the production, opposed to impact, of social harm. Bringing into focus in embedded cultures and dominant rule systems that legitimise the production of social harm, the article highlights three themes of deniability: occupational insularity; a dominant regime of knowledge; and personal disengagement. Addressing each in turn, what emerges is the mundane ways in which finance workers enact, legitimise and reproduce the conditions of harm production in the course of their occupational life. The article turns the lens of critical inquiry from an impact agenda of social harm to a production agenda and offers a detailed understanding of the ways social harms are both produced and legitimised in the day-to-day functioning of occupational life.

AB - Through Huggins et al.’s (2002) conceptualisation of violence work, the article presents the processes through which individuals and groups morally disengage from the production of social harm. In doing so, the article explores cultures of legitimation and moral disengagement that function within the City of London’s financial services industry. Despite the well documented nature of the harms emanating from finance, it is often difficult to see the human agency involved (Sarat and Culbert 2009). Consequently, there remains a lack of attention paid to the embedded cultures and rule systems that legitimise the production, opposed to impact, of social harm. Bringing into focus in embedded cultures and dominant rule systems that legitimise the production of social harm, the article highlights three themes of deniability: occupational insularity; a dominant regime of knowledge; and personal disengagement. Addressing each in turn, what emerges is the mundane ways in which finance workers enact, legitimise and reproduce the conditions of harm production in the course of their occupational life. The article turns the lens of critical inquiry from an impact agenda of social harm to a production agenda and offers a detailed understanding of the ways social harms are both produced and legitimised in the day-to-day functioning of occupational life.

KW - Violence work

KW - City of London

KW - Cultural finance studies

KW - Ethnography

KW - Moral disengagement

KW - Harm production

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 115

EP - 133

JO - Justice, Power and Resistance

T2 - Justice, Power and Resistance

JF - Justice, Power and Resistance

SN - 2398-2764

IS - 1

ER -