The development of abstract representations of tone sandhi

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Phonological processes result in surface variants of the same words across phonological contexts, posing potential word learning challenges for children. Mandarin tone sandhi is a tonal process changing Tone 3 (T3) in different tonal and syntactic contexts, resulting in allophonic variants of T3 in connected speech. Previous studies found that Mandarin-learning 3-year-olds were able to productively apply tone sandhi processes in novel compounds, correctly using the allophonic variants of T3 in appropriate tone sandhi contexts (Tang et al., 2018, 2019). However, it remains unclear how these variants are represented in children's mental lexicon. This study, therefore, examined Mandarin-learning children's perceptual representation of allophonic variants of T3. Ninety-four 3- to 5-year-olds and 29 adults were tested. Sensitivity to allophonic mispronunciations of T3 syllables in novel tone sandhi compounds was measured using a visual fixation procedure. The results showed that children, like adults, treated tone sandhi mispronunciations as target-like. Thus, in recognizing novel tone sandhi words, Mandarin-speaking children exhibit flexibility in accommodating the allophonic variants of T3, suggesting that they have developed an abstract T3 category in their mental lexicon. The findings reveal the effect of phonological processes in shaping children's phonological representations.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2114-2122
    Number of pages9
    JournalDevelopmental Psychology
    Volume55
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2019

    Keywords

    • phonological representation
    • phonological processes
    • Mandarin Chinese
    • tone sandhi
    • mispronunciation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The development of abstract representations of tone sandhi'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this