The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI)

Zachary Munn, Edoardo Aromataris, Catalin Tufanaru, Cindy Stern, Kylie Porritt, James Farrow, Craig Lockwood, Matthew Stephenson, Sandeep Moola, Lucylynn Lizarondo, Alexandra McArthur, Micah Peters, Alan Pearson, Zoe Jordan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Aim: Systematic reviews play an important role in ensuring trustworthy recommendations in healthcare. However, systematic reviews can be laborious to undertake and as such software has been developed to assist in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The Joanna Briggs Institute and its collaborating centres consist of thousands of researchers, academics and clinicians across the globe conducting systematic reviews of various types. To support them in their work, modern software and online tools are required. Our aim was to develop a software program to support systematic reviewers across the globe.

Methods: A working party was formed with extensive consultation with members of the Joanna Briggs Collaboration focusing on ideal features of a software program to support systematic reviews. The new systematic review software was built using an agile methodology and designed to be a modern web application.

Results: The new systematic review software, the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI),was successfully developed through an iterative process of development, feedback, testing and review. The software is now available (https://www.jbisumari.org/) and supports the entire systematic review process for different types of systematic reviews.

Conclusions: An agile software development approach combined with wide consultation and user testing can facilitate systematic review software design and development. This new software can support systematic reviews and guideline developers to create systematic reviews for a diverse range of questions.

LanguageEnglish
Pages36-43
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Joanna Briggs Institute
  • meta-analysis
  • software
  • systematic review

Cite this

Munn, Zachary ; Aromataris, Edoardo ; Tufanaru, Catalin ; Stern, Cindy ; Porritt, Kylie ; Farrow, James ; Lockwood, Craig ; Stephenson, Matthew ; Moola, Sandeep ; Lizarondo, Lucylynn ; McArthur, Alexandra ; Peters, Micah ; Pearson, Alan ; Jordan, Zoe. / The development of software to support multiple systematic review types : the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI). In: International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. 2019 ; Vol. 17, No. 1. pp. 36-43.
@article{5f42a7fa6af14c088135197c749349ae,
title = "The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI)",
abstract = "Aim: Systematic reviews play an important role in ensuring trustworthy recommendations in healthcare. However, systematic reviews can be laborious to undertake and as such software has been developed to assist in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The Joanna Briggs Institute and its collaborating centres consist of thousands of researchers, academics and clinicians across the globe conducting systematic reviews of various types. To support them in their work, modern software and online tools are required. Our aim was to develop a software program to support systematic reviewers across the globe.Methods: A working party was formed with extensive consultation with members of the Joanna Briggs Collaboration focusing on ideal features of a software program to support systematic reviews. The new systematic review software was built using an agile methodology and designed to be a modern web application.Results: The new systematic review software, the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI),was successfully developed through an iterative process of development, feedback, testing and review. The software is now available (https://www.jbisumari.org/) and supports the entire systematic review process for different types of systematic reviews.Conclusions: An agile software development approach combined with wide consultation and user testing can facilitate systematic review software design and development. This new software can support systematic reviews and guideline developers to create systematic reviews for a diverse range of questions.",
keywords = "Joanna Briggs Institute, meta-analysis, software, systematic review",
author = "Zachary Munn and Edoardo Aromataris and Catalin Tufanaru and Cindy Stern and Kylie Porritt and James Farrow and Craig Lockwood and Matthew Stephenson and Sandeep Moola and Lucylynn Lizarondo and Alexandra McArthur and Micah Peters and Alan Pearson and Zoe Jordan",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/XEB.0000000000000152",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "36--43",
journal = "International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare",
issn = "1744-1595",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

Munn, Z, Aromataris, E, Tufanaru, C, Stern, C, Porritt, K, Farrow, J, Lockwood, C, Stephenson, M, Moola, S, Lizarondo, L, McArthur, A, Peters, M, Pearson, A & Jordan, Z 2019, 'The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI)', International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000152

The development of software to support multiple systematic review types : the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI). / Munn, Zachary; Aromataris, Edoardo; Tufanaru, Catalin; Stern, Cindy; Porritt, Kylie; Farrow, James; Lockwood, Craig; Stephenson, Matthew; Moola, Sandeep; Lizarondo, Lucylynn; McArthur, Alexandra; Peters, Micah; Pearson, Alan; Jordan, Zoe.

In: International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, Vol. 17, No. 1, 03.2019, p. 36-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The development of software to support multiple systematic review types

T2 - International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare

AU - Munn, Zachary

AU - Aromataris, Edoardo

AU - Tufanaru, Catalin

AU - Stern, Cindy

AU - Porritt, Kylie

AU - Farrow, James

AU - Lockwood, Craig

AU - Stephenson, Matthew

AU - Moola, Sandeep

AU - Lizarondo, Lucylynn

AU - McArthur, Alexandra

AU - Peters, Micah

AU - Pearson, Alan

AU - Jordan, Zoe

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - Aim: Systematic reviews play an important role in ensuring trustworthy recommendations in healthcare. However, systematic reviews can be laborious to undertake and as such software has been developed to assist in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The Joanna Briggs Institute and its collaborating centres consist of thousands of researchers, academics and clinicians across the globe conducting systematic reviews of various types. To support them in their work, modern software and online tools are required. Our aim was to develop a software program to support systematic reviewers across the globe.Methods: A working party was formed with extensive consultation with members of the Joanna Briggs Collaboration focusing on ideal features of a software program to support systematic reviews. The new systematic review software was built using an agile methodology and designed to be a modern web application.Results: The new systematic review software, the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI),was successfully developed through an iterative process of development, feedback, testing and review. The software is now available (https://www.jbisumari.org/) and supports the entire systematic review process for different types of systematic reviews.Conclusions: An agile software development approach combined with wide consultation and user testing can facilitate systematic review software design and development. This new software can support systematic reviews and guideline developers to create systematic reviews for a diverse range of questions.

AB - Aim: Systematic reviews play an important role in ensuring trustworthy recommendations in healthcare. However, systematic reviews can be laborious to undertake and as such software has been developed to assist in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The Joanna Briggs Institute and its collaborating centres consist of thousands of researchers, academics and clinicians across the globe conducting systematic reviews of various types. To support them in their work, modern software and online tools are required. Our aim was to develop a software program to support systematic reviewers across the globe.Methods: A working party was formed with extensive consultation with members of the Joanna Briggs Collaboration focusing on ideal features of a software program to support systematic reviews. The new systematic review software was built using an agile methodology and designed to be a modern web application.Results: The new systematic review software, the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI),was successfully developed through an iterative process of development, feedback, testing and review. The software is now available (https://www.jbisumari.org/) and supports the entire systematic review process for different types of systematic reviews.Conclusions: An agile software development approach combined with wide consultation and user testing can facilitate systematic review software design and development. This new software can support systematic reviews and guideline developers to create systematic reviews for a diverse range of questions.

KW - Joanna Briggs Institute

KW - meta-analysis

KW - software

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056807412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000152

DO - 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000152

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 36

EP - 43

JO - International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare

JF - International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare

SN - 1744-1595

IS - 1

ER -