Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Dublin International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Best Practice Recommendations on the Pathology of Urachal Neoplasms

Henning Reis, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Nadine T. Gaisa, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Fiona Maclean, Toyonori Tsuzuki, Isabela Werneck da Cunha, Mahul B. Amin, Jonathan Aning, Manju Aron, Daniel Athanazio, Richard M. Bambury, Liang Cheng, Anuradha Gopalan, Christian Gulmann, Charles C. Guo, Carole Harris, Gopa Iyer, Rafael E. Jimenez, Masahiro JinzakiEiji Kikuchi, Priti Lal, Kosuke Miyai, George J. Netto, Chin-Chen Pan, Valeria Panebianco, Bas W. G. van Rhijn, Arlene Siefker-Radtke, Steven C. Smith, Tibor Szarvas, Sara E. Wobker, Glen Kristiansen, Gladell P. Paner, ISUP Expert Panel Urachal Neoplasms Urinary Bladder Glandular

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

397 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This manuscript summarizes the first part of the proceedings of the 2023 Dublin ISUP Consensus Conference encompassing the best practice recommendations on the pathology of neoplasms of urachal origin. The rationale for convening this consensus conference was the lack of structured and consented histopathologic recommendations in these rare tumors. Consensus among the meeting participants (n=80) was reached on the following statements: (1) combination of gross, histologic, clinical and imaging findings with exclusion of secondary tumor metastasis are to be used in the diagnosis of urachal carcinoma; (2) the 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) separate criteria for the diagnosis of urachal adenocarcinoma and for nonglandular carcinoma should be applied; (3) specific elements are to be evaluated and recorded in the gross examination of resection specimens containing urachal tumors; (4) sampling considerations for resection specimens containing urachal tumors are advised; (5) participants are against using 5% or 10% cutoff for the extent of intraepithelial carcinoma in urachal mucinous cystic tumor of low malignant potential; (6) use of immunohistochemical markers for the differential diagnosis of urachal adenocarcinomas in transurethral resection (TUR) specimen is considered optional; (7) similar tumor classificatory (nosology) rules for carcinomas arising from bladder mucosa (eg, urothelial carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and neuroendocrine carcinoma) should be applied for nonglandular urachal carcinomas; (8) a new staging approach other than the previously proposed systems should be designed for urachal carcinoma; (9) a system modifying the current Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for urinary bladder cancer is considered appropriate for a study in urachal carcinoma; and (10) several histologic elements are to be reported when diagnosing urachal carcinoma in TUR and resection specimens. This report from the Dublin ISUP consensus conference will serve as a practice recommendation for pathologists and as a guide for future standardized reporting protocols and research regarding urachal tumors. In addition, an international database for urachal cancers under the guidance of ISUP is being planned to be established to address pertinent issues in the pathology of urachal cancers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e18-e26
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology
Volume49
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2025

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2025. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • ISUP
  • Adenocarcinoma
  • Carcinoma
  • Consensus
  • Urachal

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Dublin International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Best Practice Recommendations on the Pathology of Urachal Neoplasms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this