The dynamics of warfare in civil war

Adam Lockyer*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explains theoretically, and demonstrates empirically, the instrumental role of the balance of capabilities in shaping the form of warfare that develops in civil wars. It contends that the current common practice of labelling civil wars as either 'guerrilla' or 'conventional' (which is usually meant to accurately characterise the type of warfare throughout an entire civil war) is unable to fully encapsulate the dynamic nature of warfare in civil war. It is instead argued that the form of warfare frequently varies significantly across time and space in a single conflict. This article is divided into three sections. Section one examines recent advances in the understanding of warfare in civil wars. It identifies three categories of warfare in civil war: conventional, guerrilla and irregular. Section two builds on previous studies to develop the concept of the balance of capabilities. Finally, the article illustrates these theoretical insights through a discussion of the American and Somali Civil Wars.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-116
Number of pages26
JournalCivil Wars
Volume12
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The dynamics of warfare in civil war'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this