The Effect of Footwear on Running Performance and Running Economy in Distance Runners

Joel T. Fuller, Clint R. Bellenger, Dominic Thewlis, Margarita D. Tsiros, Jonathan D. Buckley

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Results: Of the 1,044 records retrieved, 19 studies were included in the systematic review and 14 studies were included in the meta-analysis. No studies were identified that reported effects on running performance. Individual studies reported significant, but trivial, beneficial effects on running economy for comfortable and stiff-soled shoes [standardised mean difference (SMD) <0.12; P < 0.05), a significant small beneficial effect on running economy for cushioned shoes (SMD = 0.37; P < 0.05) and a significant moderate beneficial effect on running economy for training in minimalist shoes (SMD = 0.79; P < 0.05). Meta-analysis found significant small beneficial effects on running economy for light shoes and barefoot compared with heavy shoes (SMD < 0.34; P < 0.01) and for minimalist shoes compared with conventional shoes (SMD = 0.29; P < 0.01). A significant positive association between shoe mass and metabolic cost of running was identified (P < 0.01). Footwear with a combined shoe mass less than 440 g per pair had no detrimental effect on running economy.

Background: The effect of footwear on running economy has been investigated in numerous studies. However, no systematic review and meta-analysis has synthesised the available literature and the effect of footwear on running performance is not known.

Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of footwear on running performance and running economy in distance runners, by reviewing controlled trials that compare different footwear conditions or compare footwear with barefoot.

Methods: The Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), EMBASE, AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine), CINAHL and SPORTDiscus databases were searched from inception up until April 2014. Included articles reported on controlled trials that examined the effects of footwear or footwear characteristics (including shoe mass, cushioning, motion control, longitudinal bending stiffness, midsole viscoelasticity, drop height and comfort) on running performance or running economy and were published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Conclusions: Certain models of footwear and footwear characteristics can improve running economy. Future research in footwear performance should include measures of running performance.

LanguageEnglish
Pages411-422
Number of pages12
JournalSports Medicine
Volume45
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Shoes
Meta-Analysis
Complementary Therapies
MEDLINE
Databases
Light
Costs and Cost Analysis

Cite this

Fuller, Joel T. ; Bellenger, Clint R. ; Thewlis, Dominic ; Tsiros, Margarita D. ; Buckley, Jonathan D. / The Effect of Footwear on Running Performance and Running Economy in Distance Runners. In: Sports Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 45, No. 3. pp. 411-422.
@article{0fb3b1cf8dbd46709b0f4c4aa3b675f5,
title = "The Effect of Footwear on Running Performance and Running Economy in Distance Runners",
abstract = "Results: Of the 1,044 records retrieved, 19 studies were included in the systematic review and 14 studies were included in the meta-analysis. No studies were identified that reported effects on running performance. Individual studies reported significant, but trivial, beneficial effects on running economy for comfortable and stiff-soled shoes [standardised mean difference (SMD) <0.12; P < 0.05), a significant small beneficial effect on running economy for cushioned shoes (SMD = 0.37; P < 0.05) and a significant moderate beneficial effect on running economy for training in minimalist shoes (SMD = 0.79; P < 0.05). Meta-analysis found significant small beneficial effects on running economy for light shoes and barefoot compared with heavy shoes (SMD < 0.34; P < 0.01) and for minimalist shoes compared with conventional shoes (SMD = 0.29; P < 0.01). A significant positive association between shoe mass and metabolic cost of running was identified (P < 0.01). Footwear with a combined shoe mass less than 440 g per pair had no detrimental effect on running economy.Background: The effect of footwear on running economy has been investigated in numerous studies. However, no systematic review and meta-analysis has synthesised the available literature and the effect of footwear on running performance is not known.Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of footwear on running performance and running economy in distance runners, by reviewing controlled trials that compare different footwear conditions or compare footwear with barefoot.Methods: The Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), EMBASE, AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine), CINAHL and SPORTDiscus databases were searched from inception up until April 2014. Included articles reported on controlled trials that examined the effects of footwear or footwear characteristics (including shoe mass, cushioning, motion control, longitudinal bending stiffness, midsole viscoelasticity, drop height and comfort) on running performance or running economy and were published in a peer-reviewed journal.Conclusions: Certain models of footwear and footwear characteristics can improve running economy. Future research in footwear performance should include measures of running performance.",
author = "Fuller, {Joel T.} and Bellenger, {Clint R.} and Dominic Thewlis and Tsiros, {Margarita D.} and Buckley, {Jonathan D.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s40279-014-0283-6",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "411--422",
journal = "Sports Medicine",
issn = "0112-1642",
publisher = "Springer, Springer Nature",
number = "3",

}

The Effect of Footwear on Running Performance and Running Economy in Distance Runners. / Fuller, Joel T.; Bellenger, Clint R.; Thewlis, Dominic; Tsiros, Margarita D.; Buckley, Jonathan D.

In: Sports Medicine, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2015, p. 411-422.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effect of Footwear on Running Performance and Running Economy in Distance Runners

AU - Fuller, Joel T.

AU - Bellenger, Clint R.

AU - Thewlis, Dominic

AU - Tsiros, Margarita D.

AU - Buckley, Jonathan D.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Results: Of the 1,044 records retrieved, 19 studies were included in the systematic review and 14 studies were included in the meta-analysis. No studies were identified that reported effects on running performance. Individual studies reported significant, but trivial, beneficial effects on running economy for comfortable and stiff-soled shoes [standardised mean difference (SMD) <0.12; P < 0.05), a significant small beneficial effect on running economy for cushioned shoes (SMD = 0.37; P < 0.05) and a significant moderate beneficial effect on running economy for training in minimalist shoes (SMD = 0.79; P < 0.05). Meta-analysis found significant small beneficial effects on running economy for light shoes and barefoot compared with heavy shoes (SMD < 0.34; P < 0.01) and for minimalist shoes compared with conventional shoes (SMD = 0.29; P < 0.01). A significant positive association between shoe mass and metabolic cost of running was identified (P < 0.01). Footwear with a combined shoe mass less than 440 g per pair had no detrimental effect on running economy.Background: The effect of footwear on running economy has been investigated in numerous studies. However, no systematic review and meta-analysis has synthesised the available literature and the effect of footwear on running performance is not known.Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of footwear on running performance and running economy in distance runners, by reviewing controlled trials that compare different footwear conditions or compare footwear with barefoot.Methods: The Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), EMBASE, AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine), CINAHL and SPORTDiscus databases were searched from inception up until April 2014. Included articles reported on controlled trials that examined the effects of footwear or footwear characteristics (including shoe mass, cushioning, motion control, longitudinal bending stiffness, midsole viscoelasticity, drop height and comfort) on running performance or running economy and were published in a peer-reviewed journal.Conclusions: Certain models of footwear and footwear characteristics can improve running economy. Future research in footwear performance should include measures of running performance.

AB - Results: Of the 1,044 records retrieved, 19 studies were included in the systematic review and 14 studies were included in the meta-analysis. No studies were identified that reported effects on running performance. Individual studies reported significant, but trivial, beneficial effects on running economy for comfortable and stiff-soled shoes [standardised mean difference (SMD) <0.12; P < 0.05), a significant small beneficial effect on running economy for cushioned shoes (SMD = 0.37; P < 0.05) and a significant moderate beneficial effect on running economy for training in minimalist shoes (SMD = 0.79; P < 0.05). Meta-analysis found significant small beneficial effects on running economy for light shoes and barefoot compared with heavy shoes (SMD < 0.34; P < 0.01) and for minimalist shoes compared with conventional shoes (SMD = 0.29; P < 0.01). A significant positive association between shoe mass and metabolic cost of running was identified (P < 0.01). Footwear with a combined shoe mass less than 440 g per pair had no detrimental effect on running economy.Background: The effect of footwear on running economy has been investigated in numerous studies. However, no systematic review and meta-analysis has synthesised the available literature and the effect of footwear on running performance is not known.Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of footwear on running performance and running economy in distance runners, by reviewing controlled trials that compare different footwear conditions or compare footwear with barefoot.Methods: The Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), EMBASE, AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine), CINAHL and SPORTDiscus databases were searched from inception up until April 2014. Included articles reported on controlled trials that examined the effects of footwear or footwear characteristics (including shoe mass, cushioning, motion control, longitudinal bending stiffness, midsole viscoelasticity, drop height and comfort) on running performance or running economy and were published in a peer-reviewed journal.Conclusions: Certain models of footwear and footwear characteristics can improve running economy. Future research in footwear performance should include measures of running performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925511829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40279-014-0283-6

DO - 10.1007/s40279-014-0283-6

M3 - Review article

VL - 45

SP - 411

EP - 422

JO - Sports Medicine

T2 - Sports Medicine

JF - Sports Medicine

SN - 0112-1642

IS - 3

ER -