The effect of substrate roughness and hydroxyapatite coating thickness on implant shear strength

M. Svehla; P. Morberg; W. Bruce; B. Zicat; W. R. Walsh

doi:10.1054/arth.2002.30410

The effect of substrate roughness and hydroxyapatite coating thickness on implant shear strength

M. Svehla, P. Morberg, W. Bruce, B. Zicat, W. R. Walsh^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the role of substrate preparation and hydroxyapatite (HA) coating thickness on bone ongrowth and shear strength in a bilateral bicortical sheep model. Plasma-sprayed and grit-blasted titanium implants with different thickness HA coatings were examined at 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks after implantation. Shear strength increased with time for all implants. Plasma-sprayed implants were superior to grit-blasted implants at all time points. The 100-μm-thick HA layer used in the present study provided greater fixation and ongrowth and less resorption compared with the 50-μm-thick layer. We did not observe any advantage in using a thicker HA coating for the titanium substrates examined.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	304-311
Number of pages	8
Journal	Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume	17
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.30410
Publication status	Published - 2002
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Bone
Hydroxyapatite (HA)
Ongrowth
Push-out
Uncemented

Access to Document

10.1054/arth.2002.30410

Cite this

@article{bf58f8afe2b64bd1adbd0463a432a116,

title = "The effect of substrate roughness and hydroxyapatite coating thickness on implant shear strength",

abstract = "This study examined the role of substrate preparation and hydroxyapatite (HA) coating thickness on bone ongrowth and shear strength in a bilateral bicortical sheep model. Plasma-sprayed and grit-blasted titanium implants with different thickness HA coatings were examined at 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks after implantation. Shear strength increased with time for all implants. Plasma-sprayed implants were superior to grit-blasted implants at all time points. The 100-μm-thick HA layer used in the present study provided greater fixation and ongrowth and less resorption compared with the 50-μm-thick layer. We did not observe any advantage in using a thicker HA coating for the titanium substrates examined.",

keywords = "Bone, Hydroxyapatite (HA), Ongrowth, Push-out, Uncemented",

author = "M. Svehla and P. Morberg and W. Bruce and B. Zicat and Walsh, {W. R.}",

year = "2002",

doi = "10.1054/arth.2002.30410",

language = "English",

volume = "17",

pages = "304--311",

journal = "Journal of Arthroplasty",

issn = "0883-5403",

publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of substrate roughness and hydroxyapatite coating thickness on implant shear strength

AU - Svehla, M.

AU - Morberg, P.

AU - Bruce, W.

AU - Zicat, B.

AU - Walsh, W. R.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - This study examined the role of substrate preparation and hydroxyapatite (HA) coating thickness on bone ongrowth and shear strength in a bilateral bicortical sheep model. Plasma-sprayed and grit-blasted titanium implants with different thickness HA coatings were examined at 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks after implantation. Shear strength increased with time for all implants. Plasma-sprayed implants were superior to grit-blasted implants at all time points. The 100-μm-thick HA layer used in the present study provided greater fixation and ongrowth and less resorption compared with the 50-μm-thick layer. We did not observe any advantage in using a thicker HA coating for the titanium substrates examined.

AB - This study examined the role of substrate preparation and hydroxyapatite (HA) coating thickness on bone ongrowth and shear strength in a bilateral bicortical sheep model. Plasma-sprayed and grit-blasted titanium implants with different thickness HA coatings were examined at 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks after implantation. Shear strength increased with time for all implants. Plasma-sprayed implants were superior to grit-blasted implants at all time points. The 100-μm-thick HA layer used in the present study provided greater fixation and ongrowth and less resorption compared with the 50-μm-thick layer. We did not observe any advantage in using a thicker HA coating for the titanium substrates examined.

KW - Bone

KW - Hydroxyapatite (HA)

KW - Ongrowth

KW - Push-out

KW - Uncemented

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036217299&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1054/arth.2002.30410

DO - 10.1054/arth.2002.30410

M3 - Article

C2 - 11938506

AN - SCOPUS:0036217299

SN - 0883-5403

VL - 17

SP - 304

EP - 311

JO - Journal of Arthroplasty

JF - Journal of Arthroplasty

IS - 3

ER -

The effect of substrate roughness and hydroxyapatite coating thickness on implant shear strength

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this