The effectiveness of gait retraining on running kinematics, kinetics, performance, pain, and injury in distance runners: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of running gait retraining on kinematics, kinetics, performance, pain, and injury in distance runners. DESIGN: Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH: Seven electronic databases from inception to March 2021. TRIAL SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials that (1) evaluated running gait retraining compared to no intervention, usual training, placebo, or standard care and (2) reported biomechanical, physiological, performance, or clinical outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS: Random-effects meta-analyses were completed, and the certainty of evidence was judged using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. We categorized interventions into step rate, non-rearfoot footstrike, impact, ground contact time, and multiparameter subgroups. RESULTS: We included 19 trials (673 participants). Moderate-certainty evidence indicated step rate gait retraining increased step rate (SMD 1.03 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.63, 1.44]; number of trials (N): 4; I2: 0%) and reduced average vertical loading rate (SMD -0.57 [95% CI, -1.05 to -0.09], N: 3; I2: 0%). Low-certainty evidence indicated non-rearfoot footstrike retraining increased knee flexion at initial contact (SMD 0.74 [95% CI, 0.11 to 1.37]; N: 2; I2: 0%), but did not alter running economy (SMD 0.21 [95% CI, -1.11 to 1.52]; N: 3; I2: 19%).). Low-certainty evidence indicated multiparameter retraining did not alter running economy (SMD 0.32 [-0.39, 1.02]; N: 3; I2: 19%) or performance (SMD 0.14 [95% CI, -4.87 to 4.58]; N: 2; I2: 18%). Insufficient trials reported on pain outcomes. Two trials demonstrated reduced 1-year injury incidence following gait retraining. CONCLUSIONS: Gait retraining interventions altered step rate and knee kinematics, lowered vertical loading rates, and did not affect running performance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)192-206+A5
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
Volume52
Issue number4
Early online date5 Feb 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2022

Keywords

  • running
  • rehabilitation
  • biomechanics
  • gait analysis
  • injury prevention
  • gait retraining

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effectiveness of gait retraining on running kinematics, kinetics, performance, pain, and injury in distance runners: a systematic review with meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this