TY - JOUR
T1 - The effectiveness of gait retraining on running kinematics, kinetics, performance, pain, and injury in distance runners
T2 - a systematic review with meta-analysis
AU - Doyle, Eoin
AU - Doyle, Tim L. A.
AU - Bonacci, Jason
AU - Fuller, Joel T.
PY - 2022/4/1
Y1 - 2022/4/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of running gait retraining on kinematics, kinetics, performance, pain, and injury in distance runners. DESIGN: Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH: Seven electronic databases from inception to March 2021. TRIAL SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials that (1) evaluated running gait retraining compared to no intervention, usual training, placebo, or standard care and (2) reported biomechanical, physiological, performance, or clinical outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS: Random-effects meta-analyses were completed, and the certainty of evidence was judged using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. We categorized interventions into step rate, non-rearfoot footstrike, impact, ground contact time, and multiparameter subgroups. RESULTS: We included 19 trials (673 participants). Moderate-certainty evidence indicated step rate gait retraining increased step rate (SMD 1.03 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.63, 1.44]; number of trials (N): 4; I2: 0%) and reduced average vertical loading rate (SMD -0.57 [95% CI, -1.05 to -0.09], N: 3; I2: 0%). Low-certainty evidence indicated non-rearfoot footstrike retraining increased knee flexion at initial contact (SMD 0.74 [95% CI, 0.11 to 1.37]; N: 2; I2: 0%), but did not alter running economy (SMD 0.21 [95% CI, -1.11 to 1.52]; N: 3; I2: 19%).). Low-certainty evidence indicated multiparameter retraining did not alter running economy (SMD 0.32 [-0.39, 1.02]; N: 3; I2: 19%) or performance (SMD 0.14 [95% CI, -4.87 to 4.58]; N: 2; I2: 18%). Insufficient trials reported on pain outcomes. Two trials demonstrated reduced 1-year injury incidence following gait retraining. CONCLUSIONS: Gait retraining interventions altered step rate and knee kinematics, lowered vertical loading rates, and did not affect running performance.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of running gait retraining on kinematics, kinetics, performance, pain, and injury in distance runners. DESIGN: Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH: Seven electronic databases from inception to March 2021. TRIAL SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials that (1) evaluated running gait retraining compared to no intervention, usual training, placebo, or standard care and (2) reported biomechanical, physiological, performance, or clinical outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS: Random-effects meta-analyses were completed, and the certainty of evidence was judged using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. We categorized interventions into step rate, non-rearfoot footstrike, impact, ground contact time, and multiparameter subgroups. RESULTS: We included 19 trials (673 participants). Moderate-certainty evidence indicated step rate gait retraining increased step rate (SMD 1.03 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.63, 1.44]; number of trials (N): 4; I2: 0%) and reduced average vertical loading rate (SMD -0.57 [95% CI, -1.05 to -0.09], N: 3; I2: 0%). Low-certainty evidence indicated non-rearfoot footstrike retraining increased knee flexion at initial contact (SMD 0.74 [95% CI, 0.11 to 1.37]; N: 2; I2: 0%), but did not alter running economy (SMD 0.21 [95% CI, -1.11 to 1.52]; N: 3; I2: 19%).). Low-certainty evidence indicated multiparameter retraining did not alter running economy (SMD 0.32 [-0.39, 1.02]; N: 3; I2: 19%) or performance (SMD 0.14 [95% CI, -4.87 to 4.58]; N: 2; I2: 18%). Insufficient trials reported on pain outcomes. Two trials demonstrated reduced 1-year injury incidence following gait retraining. CONCLUSIONS: Gait retraining interventions altered step rate and knee kinematics, lowered vertical loading rates, and did not affect running performance.
KW - running
KW - rehabilitation
KW - biomechanics
KW - gait analysis
KW - injury prevention
KW - gait retraining
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128801765&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2519/jospt.2022.10585
DO - 10.2519/jospt.2022.10585
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35128941
SN - 0190-6011
VL - 52
SP - 192-206+A5
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
IS - 4
ER -