The effects of partitioning on phylogenetic inference

David Kainer, Robert Lanfear

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    94 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Partitioning is a commonly used method in phylogenetics that aims to accommodate variation in substitution patterns among sites. Despite its popularity, there have been few systematic studies of its effects on phylogenetic inference, and there have been no studies that compare the effects of different approaches to partitioning across many empirical data sets. In this study, we applied four commonly used approaches to partitioning to each of 34 empirical data sets, and then compared the resulting tree topologies, branch-lengths, and bootstrap support estimated using each approach. We find that the choice of partitioning scheme often affects tree topology, particularly when partitioning is omitted. Most notably, we find occasional instances where the use of a suboptimal partitioning scheme produces highly supported but incorrect nodes in the tree. Branch-lengths and bootstrap support are also affected by the choice of partitioning scheme, sometimes dramatically so. We discuss the reasons for these effects and make some suggestions for best practice.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1611-1627
    Number of pages17
    JournalMolecular Biology and Evolution
    Volume32
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2015

    Keywords

    • partitioning
    • tree topology
    • tree inference
    • molecular evolution

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of partitioning on phylogenetic inference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this