The ethnic and linguistic identity of the Parthians: a review of the evidence from Central Asia

John Sheldon

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Herodotus lists the Parthians, along with the Chorasmians, the Sogdians and the Arians in the sixteenth satrapy of the Persian Empire at the time of Darius I. Although Parthava is mentioned several times in the Old Persian Achaemenian inscriptions, its exact, or even comparative, locality cannot be established from these owing to different orders of enumeration. From later Classical sources we can piece together a picture of this Iranian people, but evidence is also available from Manichaean texts discovered in Central Asia in the early part of the nineteenth century. The first positive identification of one of the languages in the texts as Parthian was made by Tedesco in 1921. Since then the term has usually been adopted by scholars working on this language. The justification for and implications of this identification from an ethnic and linguistic point of view are discussed in this article.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)5-17
    Number of pages13
    JournalAsian Ethnicity
    Volume7
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2006

    Keywords

    • Parthian
    • Middle Persian
    • ethnicity
    • Manichaean
    • Arsacid
    • Sassanian

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The ethnic and linguistic identity of the Parthians: a review of the evidence from Central Asia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this