The form of a trade-off determines the response to competition

Ram Maharjan, Susanna Nilsson, Judy Sung, Ken Haynes, Robert E. Beardmore, Laurence D. Hurst, Tom Ferenci, Ivana Gudelj

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Understanding how populations and communities respond to competition is a central concern of ecology. A seminal theoretical solution first formalised by Levins (and re-derived in multiple fields) showed that, in theory, the form of a trade-off should determine the outcome of competition. While this has become a central postulate in ecology it has evaded experimental verification, not least because of substantial technical obstacles. We here solve the experimental problems by employing synthetic ecology. We engineer strains of Escherichia coli with fixed resource allocations enabling accurate measurement of trade-off shapes between bacterial survival and multiplication in multiple environments. A mathematical chemostat model predicts different, and experimentally verified, trajectories of gene frequency changes as a function of condition-specific trade-offs. The results support Levins' postulate and demonstrates that otherwise paradoxical alternative outcomes witnessed in subtly different conditions are predictable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1267-1276
Number of pages10
JournalEcology Letters
Volume16
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2013
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Keywords

  • Experimental ecology
  • mathematical models
  • microorganisms
  • resource allocation
  • stress responses
  • synthetic ecology
  • trade-off shapes
  • trade-offs

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The form of a trade-off determines the response to competition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Maharjan, R., Nilsson, S., Sung, J., Haynes, K., Beardmore, R. E., Hurst, L. D., ... Gudelj, I. (2013). The form of a trade-off determines the response to competition. Ecology Letters, 16(10), 1267-1276. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12159