The hierarchical order of processes underlying the direction illusion and the direction aftereffect

Max Farrell-Whelan, Peter Wenderoth, Kevin R. Brooks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Motion perception involves the processing of velocity signals through several hierarchical stages of the visual cortex. To better understand this process, a number of studies have sought to localise the neural substrates of two misperceptions of motion direction, the direction illusion (DI) and the direction aftereffect (DAE). These studies have produced contradictory evidence as to the hierarchical order of the processing stages from which the respective phenomena arise. We have used a simple stimulus configuration to further investigate the sequential order of processes giving rise to the DI and DAE. To this end, we measured the two phenomena invoked in combination, and also manually parsed this combined effect into its two constituents by measuring the two phenomena individually in both possible sequential orders. Comparing the predictions made from each order to the outcome from the combined effect allowed us to test the tenability of two models: the DAE-first model and the DI-first model. Our results indicate that DAE-invoking activity does not occur earlier in the motion processing hierarchy than DI-invoking activity. Although the DI-first model is not inconsistent with our data, the possible involvement of non-sequential processing may be better able to reconcile these results with those of previous studies.

LanguageEnglish
Pages389-401
Number of pages13
JournalPerception
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Processing
Direction compound
Motion Perception
Substrates
Visual Cortex

Cite this

@article{9a858fbb911246daa731849123d53dd7,
title = "The hierarchical order of processes underlying the direction illusion and the direction aftereffect",
abstract = "Motion perception involves the processing of velocity signals through several hierarchical stages of the visual cortex. To better understand this process, a number of studies have sought to localise the neural substrates of two misperceptions of motion direction, the direction illusion (DI) and the direction aftereffect (DAE). These studies have produced contradictory evidence as to the hierarchical order of the processing stages from which the respective phenomena arise. We have used a simple stimulus configuration to further investigate the sequential order of processes giving rise to the DI and DAE. To this end, we measured the two phenomena invoked in combination, and also manually parsed this combined effect into its two constituents by measuring the two phenomena individually in both possible sequential orders. Comparing the predictions made from each order to the outcome from the combined effect allowed us to test the tenability of two models: the DAE-first model and the DI-first model. Our results indicate that DAE-invoking activity does not occur earlier in the motion processing hierarchy than DI-invoking activity. Although the DI-first model is not inconsistent with our data, the possible involvement of non-sequential processing may be better able to reconcile these results with those of previous studies.",
author = "Max Farrell-Whelan and Peter Wenderoth and Brooks, {Kevin R.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1068/p6961",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "389--401",
journal = "Perception",
issn = "0301-0066",
publisher = "Pion",
number = "4",

}

The hierarchical order of processes underlying the direction illusion and the direction aftereffect. / Farrell-Whelan, Max; Wenderoth, Peter; Brooks, Kevin R.

In: Perception, Vol. 41, No. 4, 2012, p. 389-401.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The hierarchical order of processes underlying the direction illusion and the direction aftereffect

AU - Farrell-Whelan, Max

AU - Wenderoth, Peter

AU - Brooks, Kevin R.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Motion perception involves the processing of velocity signals through several hierarchical stages of the visual cortex. To better understand this process, a number of studies have sought to localise the neural substrates of two misperceptions of motion direction, the direction illusion (DI) and the direction aftereffect (DAE). These studies have produced contradictory evidence as to the hierarchical order of the processing stages from which the respective phenomena arise. We have used a simple stimulus configuration to further investigate the sequential order of processes giving rise to the DI and DAE. To this end, we measured the two phenomena invoked in combination, and also manually parsed this combined effect into its two constituents by measuring the two phenomena individually in both possible sequential orders. Comparing the predictions made from each order to the outcome from the combined effect allowed us to test the tenability of two models: the DAE-first model and the DI-first model. Our results indicate that DAE-invoking activity does not occur earlier in the motion processing hierarchy than DI-invoking activity. Although the DI-first model is not inconsistent with our data, the possible involvement of non-sequential processing may be better able to reconcile these results with those of previous studies.

AB - Motion perception involves the processing of velocity signals through several hierarchical stages of the visual cortex. To better understand this process, a number of studies have sought to localise the neural substrates of two misperceptions of motion direction, the direction illusion (DI) and the direction aftereffect (DAE). These studies have produced contradictory evidence as to the hierarchical order of the processing stages from which the respective phenomena arise. We have used a simple stimulus configuration to further investigate the sequential order of processes giving rise to the DI and DAE. To this end, we measured the two phenomena invoked in combination, and also manually parsed this combined effect into its two constituents by measuring the two phenomena individually in both possible sequential orders. Comparing the predictions made from each order to the outcome from the combined effect allowed us to test the tenability of two models: the DAE-first model and the DI-first model. Our results indicate that DAE-invoking activity does not occur earlier in the motion processing hierarchy than DI-invoking activity. Although the DI-first model is not inconsistent with our data, the possible involvement of non-sequential processing may be better able to reconcile these results with those of previous studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863734061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1068/p6961

DO - 10.1068/p6961

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 389

EP - 401

JO - Perception

T2 - Perception

JF - Perception

SN - 0301-0066

IS - 4

ER -